ToolMage
Anmelden
OpnForm
Open Source · 30K monatliche besuche

OpnForm ist ein Open-Source, KI-gestützter Formular-Builder, mit dem Benutzer unbegrenzt schöne Formulare kostenlos erstellen können. Mit seiner intuitiven No-Code-Oberfläche, der KI-Formularerstellung aus Textaufforderungen und umfangreichen Anpassungsoptionen ist es perfekt für Umfragen, Kontaktformulare und die Datenerfassung. Es bietet einen großzügigen kostenlosen Plan und leistungsstarke Pro-Funktionen wie erweiterte Integrationen, benutzerdefinierte Domains und API-Zugriff.

VS
Typebot
Chatbots · 26.3K monatliche besuche

Typebot ist eine Open-Source-No-Code-Plattform zur Erstellung fortschrittlicher Konversations-Apps und Chatbots. Sie ermöglicht es Benutzern, ansprechende, interaktive Erlebnisse für Marketing, Vertrieb und Support zu schaffen und diese auf Websites, WhatsApp und anderen Plattformen bereitzustellen, um Konversionen zu steigern und die Kommunikation zu automatisieren.

OpnForm vs Typebot: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche OpnForm und Typebot nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

OpnForm Produktübersicht

OpnForm ist ein Open-Source, KI-gestützter Formular-Builder, mit dem Benutzer unbegrenzt schöne Formulare kostenlos erstellen können. Mit seiner intuitiven No-Code-Oberfläche, der KI-Formularerstellung aus Textaufforderungen und umfangreichen Anpassungsoptionen ist es perfekt für Umfragen, Kontaktformulare und die Datenerfassung. Es bietet einen großzügigen kostenlosen Plan und leistungsstarke Pro-Funktionen wie erweiterte Integrationen, benutzerdefinierte Domains und API-Zugriff.

Preview

Typebot Produktübersicht

Typebot ist eine Open-Source-No-Code-Plattform zur Erstellung fortschrittlicher Konversations-Apps und Chatbots. Sie ermöglicht es Benutzern, ansprechende, interaktive Erlebnisse für Marketing, Vertrieb und Support zu schaffen und diese auf Websites, WhatsApp und anderen Plattformen bereitzustellen, um Konversionen zu steigern und die Kommunikation zu automatisieren.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureOpnFormTypebot
HauptkategorieOpen SourceChatbots
Hinzugefügt2025-08-142025-09-23
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websiteopnform.comtypebot.io
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche30K26.3K
Monatliches Wachstum79.6%-66.7%
Favoriten8991
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

OpnForm vs Typebot monthly traffic

Compare OpnForm and Typebot by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the OpnForm vs Typebot monthly traffic comparison, OpnForm currently shows 30K visits and Typebot shows 26.3K; OpnForm has about 1.1 times the visible traffic of Typebot, an absolute difference of about 3.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

OpnForm monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
30K
Ø Besuchsdauer
2:31
Seiten pro Besuch
3.24
Absprungrate
39.38%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 30.2K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 29.2K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 40.8K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 25K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 16.7K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 30K Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States50.34%15.1K
🇩🇪Germany15.43%4.6K
🇳🇬Nigeria13.94%4.2K
🇮🇳India10.39%3.1K
🇹🇼Taiwan9.9%3K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt66.63%20K
Verweis31.19%9.4K
E-Mail2.18%654

Suchbegriffe

open formopenformopnformopnforms oidcregistration forms open source

Typebot monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
26.3K
Ø Besuchsdauer
0:18
Seiten pro Besuch
1.77
Absprungrate
38.75%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 161.1K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 184K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 206.6K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 212.3K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 78.9K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 26.3K Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇧🇷Brazil44.29%11.6K
🇻🇳Vietnam15.94%4.2K
🇫🇷France14.96%3.9K
🇵🇪Peru12.99%3.4K
🇺🇸United States11.82%3.1K

Suchbegriffe

type bottypebottypebot 픽셀typebot.iotypebot releases
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of OpnForm and Typebot

OpnForm Core features

Open Source
Lead-Generierung
Formulare

Typebot Core features

Open Source
Lead-Generierung
Chatbots
No-Code

Use cases

OpnForm Use cases

Formular-Builder
Lead-Generierung
No-Code
Open Source
Umfragetool
KI-Formulargenerator
Datenerfassung
Online-Formulare
Typeform-Alternative
Webformulare

Typebot Use cases

Formular-Builder
Lead-Generierung
No-Code
Open Source
Umfragetool
KI-Integration
Chatbot-Builder
Konversationsmarketing
Kundensupport-Automatisierung
WhatsApp-Bot

Best suited roles

OpnForm Best suited roles

Keine verifizierten Daten

Typebot Best suited roles

Geschäftsinhaber
Content Creator
Kundensupport
Personalmanager
Marketing Manager
Nocode-Entwickler
Produktmanager
Vertriebsmitarbeiter
Softwareentwickler

OpnForm vs Typebot:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth OpnForm vs Typebot comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. OpnForm is primarily listed under “Open Source”, while Typebot is primarily listed under “Chatbots”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (OpnForm: Open Source; Typebot: Chatbots); Monthly visits (OpnForm: 30K; Typebot: 26.3K); Monthly growth (OpnForm: 79.6%; Typebot: -66.7%); Favorites (OpnForm: 89; Typebot: 91); Website (OpnForm: opnform.com; Typebot: typebot.io). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the OpnForm vs Typebot monthly traffic comparison, OpnForm currently shows 30K visits and Typebot shows 26.3K; OpnForm has about 1.1 times the visible traffic of Typebot, an absolute difference of about 3.7K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

OpnForm and Typebot currently overlap in shared categories: Open Source und Lead-Generierung; shared tags: Formular-Builder, Lead-Generierung, No-Code, Open Source und Umfragetool. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

OpnForm's unique categories/tags are Formulare, KI-Formulargenerator, Datenerfassung, Online-Formulare, Typeform-Alternative und Webformulare; Typebot's are Chatbots, No-Code, KI-Integration, Chatbot-Builder, Konversationsmarketing, Kundensupport-Automatisierung und WhatsApp-Bot. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

OpnForm has no verified rating, 0 comments, 89 favorites, and 91 likes;Typebot has no verified rating, 0 comments, 91 favorites, and 98 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate OpnForm first

Put OpnForm on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Open Source” and especially Formulare, KI-Formulargenerator, Datenerfassung, Online-Formulare, Typeform-Alternative und Webformulare. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

OpnForm also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 30K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Typebot first

Put Typebot on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Chatbots” and especially Chatbots, No-Code, KI-Integration, Chatbot-Builder, Konversationsmarketing und Kundensupport-Automatisierung, or the users include Geschäftsinhaber, Content Creator, Kundensupport und Personalmanager. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Typebot also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 26.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in OpnForm and Typebot, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between OpnForm and Typebot?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.