ToolMage
Anmelden
Raycast
Workflow-Automatisierung · 1.1M monatliche besuche

Raycast ist ein blitzschneller, erweiterbarer Launcher für macOS, der Ihre Produktivität steigert. Er ersetzt Spotlight durch eine leistungsstarke Befehlszeilenschnittstelle zur Steuerung Ihrer Tools, zum Suchen von Dateien, Ausführen von Skripten und Automatisieren von Aufgaben. Mit einem integrierten KI-Assistenten, einem riesigen Store mit von der Community erstellten Erweiterungen und Funktionen wie Zwischenablage-Verlauf, Snippets und Fenster-Management zentralisiert Raycast Ihren Workflow und spart Ihnen Zeit und Kontextwechsel.

Website besuchenDetails ansehen
VS
ScreenML
Screenshot-Tool · 4.1K monatliche besuche

ScreenML ist ein KI-gestütztes MacOS-Dienstprogramm, das Ihre Screenshots automatisch mit kontextbezogenen, beschreibenden Dateinamen umbenennt. Es beseitigt überladene Desktops und zeitgestempelte Dateinamen und macht Ihre Screenshots organisiert, durchsuchbar und einfach zu verwalten, was Ihren gesamten Arbeitsablauf optimiert.

Website besuchenDetails ansehen

Raycast vs ScreenML: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Raycast und ScreenML nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Raycast Produktübersicht

Raycast ist ein blitzschneller, erweiterbarer Launcher für macOS, der Ihre Produktivität steigert. Er ersetzt Spotlight durch eine leistungsstarke Befehlszeilenschnittstelle zur Steuerung Ihrer Tools, zum Suchen von Dateien, Ausführen von Skripten und Automatisieren von Aufgaben. Mit einem integrierten KI-Assistenten, einem riesigen Store mit von der Community erstellten Erweiterungen und Funktionen wie Zwischenablage-Verlauf, Snippets und Fenster-Management zentralisiert Raycast Ihren Workflow und spart Ihnen Zeit und Kontextwechsel.

Preview

ScreenML Produktübersicht

ScreenML ist ein KI-gestütztes MacOS-Dienstprogramm, das Ihre Screenshots automatisch mit kontextbezogenen, beschreibenden Dateinamen umbenennt. Es beseitigt überladene Desktops und zeitgestempelte Dateinamen und macht Ihre Screenshots organisiert, durchsuchbar und einfach zu verwalten, was Ihren gesamten Arbeitsablauf optimiert.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureRaycastScreenML
HauptkategorieWorkflow-AutomatisierungScreenshot-Tool
Hinzugefügt2025-08-032025-08-01
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitewww.raycast.comscreenml.com
ProdukttypAppApp
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche1.1M4.1K
Monatliches Wachstum25.2%Nicht verifiziert
Favoriten12596
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Raycast vs ScreenML monthly traffic

Compare Raycast and ScreenML by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Raycast vs ScreenML monthly traffic comparison, Raycast currently shows 1.1M visits and ScreenML shows 4.1K; Raycast has about 259.3 times the visible traffic of ScreenML, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Raycast has complete third-party traffic details; ScreenML uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Raycast monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
1.1M
Ø Besuchsdauer
2:16
Seiten pro Besuch
2.59
Absprungrate
52.69%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 816.3K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 756K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 837.6K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 847.1K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 1.1M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States41.13%436.2K
🇧🇷Brazil26.12%277K
🇨🇳China11.89%126.1K
🇩🇪Germany10.82%114.8K
🇮🇳India10.04%106.5K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt83.86%889.4K
Verweis14.95%158.6K
E-Mail1.19%12.6K

Suchbegriffe

raycastraycast airaycast extensionsraycast macraycast windows

ScreenML monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
4.1K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Raycast and ScreenML

Raycast Core features

Dienstprogramme
Workflow-Automatisierung
Launcher

ScreenML Core features

Dienstprogramme
Screenshot-Tool
Dateiverwaltung

Use cases

Raycast Use cases

Automatisierung
macOS
Produktivität
KI-Assistent
Befehlszeile
Entwicklerwerkzeuge
Erweiterungen
Launcher
Suche
Snippets
Spotlight-Austausch
Fensterverwaltung

ScreenML Use cases

Automatisierung
macOS
Produktivität
KI-Namensgebung
Design-Tool
Entwicklerwerkzeug
Dateiverwaltung
Dateiorganisation
Screenshot

Raycast vs ScreenML：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Raycast vs ScreenML comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Raycast is primarily listed under “Workflow-Automatisierung”, while ScreenML is primarily listed under “Screenshot-Tool”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Raycast: Workflow-Automatisierung; ScreenML: Screenshot-Tool); Monthly visits (Raycast: 1.1M; ScreenML: 4.1K); Favorites (Raycast: 125; ScreenML: 96); Website (Raycast: www.raycast.com; ScreenML: screenml.com); Added (Raycast: 2025-08-03; ScreenML: 2025-08-01). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Raycast vs ScreenML monthly traffic comparison, Raycast currently shows 1.1M visits and ScreenML shows 4.1K; Raycast has about 259.3 times the visible traffic of ScreenML, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Raycast has complete third-party traffic details; ScreenML uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Raycast and ScreenML currently overlap in shared categories: Dienstprogramme; shared tags: Automatisierung, macOS und Produktivität. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Raycast's unique categories/tags are Workflow-Automatisierung, Launcher, KI-Assistent, Befehlszeile, Entwicklerwerkzeuge, Erweiterungen, Suche und Snippets; ScreenML's are Screenshot-Tool, Dateiverwaltung, KI-Namensgebung, Design-Tool, Entwicklerwerkzeug, Dateiorganisation und Screenshot. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Raycast has no verified rating, 0 comments, 125 favorites, and 128 likes；ScreenML has no verified rating, 0 comments, 96 favorites, and 113 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Raycast first

Put Raycast on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Workflow-Automatisierung” and especially Workflow-Automatisierung, Launcher, KI-Assistent, Befehlszeile, Entwicklerwerkzeuge und Erweiterungen. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Raycast also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 1.1M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate ScreenML first

Put ScreenML on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Screenshot-Tool” and especially Screenshot-Tool, Dateiverwaltung, KI-Namensgebung, Design-Tool, Entwicklerwerkzeug und Dateiorganisation. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

ScreenML also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 4.1K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Raycast and ScreenML, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Raycast and ScreenML?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.