ToolMage
Anmelden
Matterport
3D-Modellierung · 12.4M monatliche besuche

Matterport ist eine führende KI-gestützte Plattform zur Erstellung immersiver digitaler 3D-Zwillinge von physischen Räumen. Sie ermöglicht es Benutzern, interaktive 3D-Modelle für Branchen wie Immobilien, Bauwesen und Facility Management zu erfassen, zu teilen und gemeinsam daran zu arbeiten. Die Plattform wandelt räumliche Daten in fotorealistische, maßgenaue virtuelle Erlebnisse um, komplett mit integrierten Daten und Werkzeugen.

VS
Unity
3D-Modellierung · 8.7M monatliche besuche

Unity ist die weltweit führende Echtzeit-3D-Entwicklungsplattform zur Erstellung und zum Betrieb interaktiver Inhalte. Sie befähigt Kreative aus allen Branchen, von Spielen und Film bis hin zu Automobil und Architektur, immersive Erlebnisse für über 20 Plattformen zu schaffen, darunter PC, Mobilgeräte, Konsolen, VR und AR.

Matterport vs Unity: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Matterport und Unity nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Matterport Produktübersicht

Matterport ist eine führende KI-gestützte Plattform zur Erstellung immersiver digitaler 3D-Zwillinge von physischen Räumen. Sie ermöglicht es Benutzern, interaktive 3D-Modelle für Branchen wie Immobilien, Bauwesen und Facility Management zu erfassen, zu teilen und gemeinsam daran zu arbeiten. Die Plattform wandelt räumliche Daten in fotorealistische, maßgenaue virtuelle Erlebnisse um, komplett mit integrierten Daten und Werkzeugen.

Preview

Unity Produktübersicht

Unity ist die weltweit führende Echtzeit-3D-Entwicklungsplattform zur Erstellung und zum Betrieb interaktiver Inhalte. Sie befähigt Kreative aus allen Branchen, von Spielen und Film bis hin zu Automobil und Architektur, immersive Erlebnisse für über 20 Plattformen zu schaffen, darunter PC, Mobilgeräte, Konsolen, VR und AR.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureMatterportUnity
Hauptkategorie3D-Modellierung3D-Modellierung
Hinzugefügt2025-08-162025-08-03
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitematterport.comunity.com
ProdukttypWebsiteApp
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche12.4M8.7M
Monatliches Wachstum-6%5.5%
Favoriten131112
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Matterport vs Unity monthly traffic

Compare Matterport and Unity by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Matterport vs Unity monthly traffic comparison, Matterport currently shows 12.4M visits and Unity shows 8.7M; Matterport has about 1.4 times the visible traffic of Unity, an absolute difference of about 3.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Unity is registered at the unity.com/cn subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Matterport monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
12.4M
Ø Besuchsdauer
2:11
Seiten pro Besuch
2.44
Absprungrate
65.69%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 12.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 12.7M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 11.5M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 13.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 13.2M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 12.4M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States61.89%7.7M
🇬🇧United Kingdom17.28%2.1M
🇨🇦Canada8.78%1.1M
🇯🇵Japan8.63%1.1M
🇩🇪Germany3.42%424.7K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt65.15%8.1M
Verweis32.75%4.1M
E-Mail2.1%260.8K

Suchbegriffe

matter portmatterportmatterport log inmatterport loginpolycam

Unity monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
8.7M
Ø Besuchsdauer
4:58
Seiten pro Besuch
6.73
Absprungrate
31.59%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/2: 8.3M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 8.9M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 8.3M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 8.7M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States44.19%3.9M
🇮🇳India15.88%1.4M
🇰🇷Korea, Republic of13.73%1.2M
🇨🇳China13.25%1.2M
🇹🇷Turkey12.95%1.1M

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt84.28%7.4M
Verweis13.71%1.2M
E-Mail2.01%175.7K

Suchbegriffe

unityunity aiunity asset storeunity downloadunity hub
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Matterport first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Matterport and Unity

Matterport Core features

3D-Modellierung
Architektur
Projektmanagement
Virtuelle Tour

Unity Core features

3D-Modellierung
Entwicklung
Spiel-Engine
Zusammenarbeit

Use cases

Matterport Use cases

Digitaler Zwilling
3D-Scannen
3D-Tour
Architektur, Ingenieurwesen und Bauwesen
KI
Bau
Facility Management
Immobilienmarketing
Immobilien
virtuelle Tour

Unity Use cases

Digitaler Zwilling
3D-Engine
AR-Entwicklung
plattformübergreifend
C#-Scripting
Spieleentwicklung
Spielmonetarisierung
Industriesimulation
Echtzeit-3D
VR-Entwicklung

Matterport vs Unity:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Matterport vs Unity comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Matterport is primarily listed under “3D-Modellierung”, while Unity is primarily listed under “3D-Modellierung”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Product type (Matterport: Website; Unity: App); Monthly visits (Matterport: 12.4M; Unity: 8.7M); Monthly growth (Matterport: -6%; Unity: 5.5%); Favorites (Matterport: 131; Unity: 112); Website (Matterport: matterport.com; Unity: unity.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Matterport vs Unity monthly traffic comparison, Matterport currently shows 12.4M visits and Unity shows 8.7M; Matterport has about 1.4 times the visible traffic of Unity, an absolute difference of about 3.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Unity is registered at the unity.com/cn subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Matterport first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Matterport and Unity currently overlap in shared categories: 3D-Modellierung; shared tags: Digitaler Zwilling. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Matterport's unique categories/tags are Architektur, Projektmanagement, Virtuelle Tour, 3D-Scannen, 3D-Tour, Architektur, Ingenieurwesen und Bauwesen, KI und Bau; Unity's are Entwicklung, Spiel-Engine, Zusammenarbeit, 3D-Engine, AR-Entwicklung, plattformübergreifend, C#-Scripting und Spieleentwicklung. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Matterport has no verified rating, 0 comments, 131 favorites, and 120 likes;Unity has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 115 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Matterport first

Put Matterport on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3D-Modellierung” and especially Architektur, Projektmanagement, Virtuelle Tour, 3D-Scannen, 3D-Tour und Architektur, Ingenieurwesen und Bauwesen. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Matterport also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 12.4M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Unity first

Put Unity on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “3D-Modellierung” and especially Entwicklung, Spiel-Engine, Zusammenarbeit, 3D-Engine, AR-Entwicklung und plattformübergreifend. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Unity also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 8.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Matterport and Unity, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Matterport and Unity?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.