ToolMage
Iniciar sesión
Gem
CRM · 1.3M visitas mensuales

Gem es una plataforma de reclutamiento todo en uno, con IA como prioridad, que combina ATS, CRM, sourcing, programación y análisis. Está diseñada para ayudar a los equipos de adquisición de talento a ahorrar tiempo, reducir costos y contratar al mejor talento más rápido al unificar todo el flujo de trabajo de reclutamiento en un único sistema inteligente.

VS
Humanly
CRM · 139K visitas mensuales

Humanly es una plataforma de reclutamiento basada en IA, diseñada para automatizar y escalar la contratación de alto volumen. Combina un CRM e IA Agéntica para gestionar todo el viaje del candidato, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta la programación y entrevistas. La plataforma interactúa con el 100% de los solicitantes, ayudando a los equipos a contratar hasta 8 veces más rápido sin aumentar la plantilla, al tiempo que mejora la experiencia del candidato y promueve prácticas de contratación justas.

Gem vs Humanly: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara Gem y Humanly por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

Gem Resumen del producto

Gem es una plataforma de reclutamiento todo en uno, con IA como prioridad, que combina ATS, CRM, sourcing, programación y análisis. Está diseñada para ayudar a los equipos de adquisición de talento a ahorrar tiempo, reducir costos y contratar al mejor talento más rápido al unificar todo el flujo de trabajo de reclutamiento en un único sistema inteligente.

Preview

Humanly Resumen del producto

Humanly es una plataforma de reclutamiento basada en IA, diseñada para automatizar y escalar la contratación de alto volumen. Combina un CRM e IA Agéntica para gestionar todo el viaje del candidato, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta la programación y entrevistas. La plataforma interactúa con el 100% de los solicitantes, ayudando a los equipos a contratar hasta 8 veces más rápido sin aumentar la plantilla, al tiempo que mejora la experiencia del candidato y promueve prácticas de contratación justas.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureGemHumanly
Categoría principalCRMCRM
Añadido2025-08-102025-08-05
PrecioDe pagoSin verificar
Sitio oficialwww.gem.comwww.humanly.io
Tipo de productoSitio webSitio web
Performance data
ValoraciónSin verificarSin verificar
Comentarios00
Visitas mensuales1.3M139K
Crecimiento mensual-0.2%-8.9%
Favoritos82123
DetailsVer detallesVer detalles

Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic

Compare Gem and Humanly by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic comparison, Gem currently shows 1.3M visits and Humanly shows 139K; Gem has about 9.2 times the visible traffic of Humanly, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Gem monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
1.3M
Duración media
1:28
Páginas por visita
2.24
Tasa de rebote
58.51%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 846.2K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 1.3M Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States77.43%986.9K
🇮🇳India9.55%121.7K
🇨🇦Canada8.52%108.6K
🇬🇧United Kingdom2.46%31.4K
🇵🇰Pakistan2.04%26K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo63.41%808.2K
Referido31.31%399K
Correo electrónico5.28%67.3K

Palabras clave

gemgem aigem loginjuiceboxluma ai

Humanly monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
139K
Duración media
0:57
Páginas por visita
1.33
Tasa de rebote
58.41%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 118.3K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 146.9K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 158.7K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 152.4K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 152.6K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 139K Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States81.3%113K
🇦🇷Argentina7.31%10.2K
🇨🇦Canada6.04%8.4K
🇮🇳India3.32%4.6K
🇻🇳Vietnam2.03%2.8K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo60.2%83.7K
Referido37.19%51.7K
Correo electrónico2.61%3.6K

Palabras clave

cohumanly aihumainhumanlyhumanly pricinghumans&
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Gem first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Gem and Humanly

Gem Core features

CRM
Reclutamiento
Automatización

Humanly Core features

CRM
Reclutamiento
Automatización

Use cases

Gem Use cases

automatización
CRM
Contratación
recursos humanos
Reclutamiento
adquisición de talento
Reclutador de IA
Análisis
ATS
Gestión de Candidatos
Abastecimiento

Humanly Use cases

automatización
CRM
Contratación
recursos humanos
Reclutamiento
adquisición de talento
Chatbot de IA
seguimiento de candidatos
Selección de candidatos
Programación

Gem vs Humanly:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Gem vs Humanly comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Gem is primarily listed under “CRM”, while Humanly is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Gem: Paid; Humanly: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Gem: 1.3M; Humanly: 139K); Monthly growth (Gem: -0.2%; Humanly: -8.9%); Favorites (Gem: 82; Humanly: 123); Website (Gem: www.gem.com; Humanly: www.humanly.io). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic comparison, Gem currently shows 1.3M visits and Humanly shows 139K; Gem has about 9.2 times the visible traffic of Humanly, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Gem first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Gem and Humanly currently overlap in shared categories: CRM, Reclutamiento y Automatización; shared tags: automatización, CRM, Contratación, recursos humanos, Reclutamiento y adquisición de talento. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Gem's unique categories/tags are Reclutador de IA, Análisis, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos y Abastecimiento; Humanly's are Chatbot de IA, seguimiento de candidatos, Selección de candidatos y Programación. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Gem has no verified rating, 0 comments, 82 favorites, and 87 likes;Humanly has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 123 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Gem first

Put Gem on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Reclutador de IA, Análisis, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos y Abastecimiento. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Gem also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.3M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Humanly first

Put Humanly on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Chatbot de IA, seguimiento de candidatos, Selección de candidatos y Programación. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Humanly also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 139K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Gem and Humanly, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between Gem and Humanly?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.