Gem es una plataforma de reclutamiento todo en uno, con IA como prioridad, que combina ATS, CRM, sourcing, programación y análisis. Está diseñada para ayudar a los equipos de adquisición de talento a ahorrar tiempo, reducir costos y contratar al mejor talento más rápido al unificar todo el flujo de trabajo de reclutamiento en un único sistema inteligente.
Humanly es una plataforma de reclutamiento basada en IA, diseñada para automatizar y escalar la contratación de alto volumen. Combina un CRM e IA Agéntica para gestionar todo el viaje del candidato, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta la programación y entrevistas. La plataforma interactúa con el 100% de los solicitantes, ayudando a los equipos a contratar hasta 8 veces más rápido sin aumentar la plantilla, al tiempo que mejora la experiencia del candidato y promueve prácticas de contratación justas.
Resumen del producto
Gem Resumen del producto
Gem es una plataforma de reclutamiento todo en uno, con IA como prioridad, que combina ATS, CRM, sourcing, programación y análisis. Está diseñada para ayudar a los equipos de adquisición de talento a ahorrar tiempo, reducir costos y contratar al mejor talento más rápido al unificar todo el flujo de trabajo de reclutamiento en un único sistema inteligente.
Humanly Resumen del producto
Humanly es una plataforma de reclutamiento basada en IA, diseñada para automatizar y escalar la contratación de alto volumen. Combina un CRM e IA Agéntica para gestionar todo el viaje del candidato, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta la programación y entrevistas. La plataforma interactúa con el 100% de los solicitantes, ayudando a los equipos a contratar hasta 8 veces más rápido sin aumentar la plantilla, al tiempo que mejora la experiencia del candidato y promueve prácticas de contratación justas.
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Gem | Humanly |
|---|---|---|
| Categoría principal | CRM | CRM |
| Añadido | 2025-08-10 | 2025-08-05 |
| Precio | De pago | Sin verificar |
| Sitio oficial | www.gem.com | www.humanly.io |
| Tipo de producto | Sitio web | Sitio web |
| Performance data | ||
| Valoración | Sin verificar | Sin verificar |
| Comentarios | 0 | 0 |
| Visitas mensuales | 1.3M | 139K |
| Crecimiento mensual | -0.2% | -8.9% |
| Favoritos | 82 | 123 |
| Details | Ver detalles | Ver detalles |
Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic
Compare Gem and Humanly by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic comparison, Gem currently shows 1.3M visits and Humanly shows 139K; Gem has about 9.2 times the visible traffic of Humanly, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Gem monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 846.2K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/1: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/2: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/3: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/4: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/5: 1.3M Visitas mensuales
Regiones principales
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 77.43% | 986.9K |
| 🇮🇳India | 9.55% | 121.7K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 8.52% | 108.6K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 2.46% | 31.4K |
| 🇵🇰Pakistan | 2.04% | 26K |
Fuentes de tráfico
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Directo | 63.41% | 808.2K |
| Referido | 31.31% | 399K |
| Correo electrónico | 5.28% | 67.3K |
Palabras clave
Humanly monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 118.3K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/1: 146.9K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/2: 158.7K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/3: 152.4K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/4: 152.6K Visitas mensuales
- 2026/5: 139K Visitas mensuales
Regiones principales
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 81.3% | 113K |
| 🇦🇷Argentina | 7.31% | 10.2K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 6.04% | 8.4K |
| 🇮🇳India | 3.32% | 4.6K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 2.03% | 2.8K |
Fuentes de tráfico
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Directo | 60.2% | 83.7K |
| Referido | 37.19% | 51.7K |
| Correo electrónico | 2.61% | 3.6K |
Palabras clave
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Gem and Humanly
Gem Core features
Humanly Core features
Use cases
Gem Use cases
Humanly Use cases
Gem vs Humanly:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Gem vs Humanly comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Gem is primarily listed under “CRM”, while Humanly is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Gem: Paid; Humanly: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Gem: 1.3M; Humanly: 139K); Monthly growth (Gem: -0.2%; Humanly: -8.9%); Favorites (Gem: 82; Humanly: 123); Website (Gem: www.gem.com; Humanly: www.humanly.io). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic comparison, Gem currently shows 1.3M visits and Humanly shows 139K; Gem has about 9.2 times the visible traffic of Humanly, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Gem first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Gem and Humanly currently overlap in shared categories: CRM, Reclutamiento y Automatización; shared tags: automatización, CRM, Contratación, recursos humanos, Reclutamiento y adquisición de talento. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Gem's unique categories/tags are Reclutador de IA, Análisis, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos y Abastecimiento; Humanly's are Chatbot de IA, seguimiento de candidatos, Selección de candidatos y Programación. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Gem has no verified rating, 0 comments, 82 favorites, and 87 likes;Humanly has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 123 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Gem first
Put Gem on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Reclutador de IA, Análisis, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos y Abastecimiento. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Gem also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.3M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Humanly first
Put Humanly on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Chatbot de IA, seguimiento de candidatos, Selección de candidatos y Programación. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Humanly also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 139K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Gem and Humanly, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




