Lever es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que combina un completo Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos (ATS) con robustas capacidades de Gestión de Relaciones con Candidatos (CRM). Simplifica todo el proceso de contratación, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta las entrevistas y la construcción de relaciones, para equipos de todos los tamaños. Su suite de AI Companions ayuda a automatizar tareas, reducir sesgos e identificar a los mejores candidatos más rápidamente.
TopDev es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que ayuda a las empresas a contratar a los mejores desarrolladores analizando sus perfiles de GitHub. Evalúa habilidades técnicas, fiabilidad y consistencia para proporcionar información detallada, agilizando el proceso de contratación y ahorrando un tiempo significativo a los equipos de RR.HH. y a las startups.
Resumen del producto
Lever Resumen del producto
Lever es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que combina un completo Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos (ATS) con robustas capacidades de Gestión de Relaciones con Candidatos (CRM). Simplifica todo el proceso de contratación, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta las entrevistas y la construcción de relaciones, para equipos de todos los tamaños. Su suite de AI Companions ayuda a automatizar tareas, reducir sesgos e identificar a los mejores candidatos más rápidamente.
TopDev Resumen del producto
TopDev es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que ayuda a las empresas a contratar a los mejores desarrolladores analizando sus perfiles de GitHub. Evalúa habilidades técnicas, fiabilidad y consistencia para proporcionar información detallada, agilizando el proceso de contratación y ahorrando un tiempo significativo a los equipos de RR.HH. y a las startups.
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Lever | TopDev |
|---|---|---|
| Categoría principal | Gestión del Talento | Análisis de Código |
| Añadido | 2025-08-17 | 2025-08-11 |
| Precio | De pago | Freemium |
| Sitio oficial | www.lever.co | www.topdev.online |
| Tipo de producto | Sitio web | Sitio web |
| Performance data | ||
| Valoración | Sin verificar | Sin verificar |
| Comentarios | 0 | 0 |
| Visitas mensuales | 11.8M | 3.5K |
| Crecimiento mensual | -7.4% | Sin verificar |
| Favoritos | 107 | 98 |
| Details | Ver detalles | Ver detalles |
Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic
Compare Lever and TopDev by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Lever monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 12.9M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/1: 13.8M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/2: 12.9M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/3: 13.5M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/4: 12.7M Visitas mensuales
- 2026/5: 11.8M Visitas mensuales
Regiones principales
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 68.35% | 8M |
| 🇮🇳India | 16.91% | 2M |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 6.68% | 786.3K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 5.35% | 629.7K |
| 🇫🇷France | 2.71% | 319K |
Fuentes de tráfico
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Directo | 58.95% | 6.9M |
| Referido | 36.32% | 4.3M |
| Correo electrónico | 4.73% | 556.7K |
Palabras clave
TopDev monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Lever and TopDev
Lever Core features
TopDev Core features
Use cases
Lever Use cases
TopDev Use cases
Lever vs TopDev:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Lever vs TopDev comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Lever is primarily listed under “Gestión del Talento”, while TopDev is primarily listed under “Análisis de Código”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Lever: Gestión del Talento; TopDev: Análisis de Código); Pricing (Lever: Paid; TopDev: Freemium); Monthly visits (Lever: 11.8M; TopDev: 3.5K); Favorites (Lever: 107; TopDev: 98); Website (Lever: www.lever.co; TopDev: www.topdev.online). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Lever and TopDev currently overlap in shared categories: Reclutamiento; shared tags: Reclutamiento de IA, Contratación y Tecnología de RRHH. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Lever's unique categories/tags are Gestión del Talento, Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos, CRM, recursos humanos y Reclutamiento; TopDev's are Análisis de Código, Búsqueda de Talento, Búsqueda de candidatos, Contratación de Desarrolladores, Análisis de GitHub, Búsqueda de talento y Cribado técnico. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Lever has no verified rating, 0 comments, 107 favorites, and 97 likes;TopDev has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 106 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Lever first
Put Lever on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestión del Talento” and especially Gestión del Talento, Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos y CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Lever also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 11.8M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate TopDev first
Put TopDev on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Análisis de Código” and especially Análisis de Código, Búsqueda de Talento, Búsqueda de candidatos, Contratación de Desarrolladores, Análisis de GitHub y Búsqueda de talento. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
TopDev also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.5K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Lever and TopDev, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




