ToolMage
Iniciar sesión
Lever
Gestión del Talento · 11.8M visitas mensuales

Lever es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que combina un completo Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos (ATS) con robustas capacidades de Gestión de Relaciones con Candidatos (CRM). Simplifica todo el proceso de contratación, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta las entrevistas y la construcción de relaciones, para equipos de todos los tamaños. Su suite de AI Companions ayuda a automatizar tareas, reducir sesgos e identificar a los mejores candidatos más rápidamente.

VS
TopDev
Análisis de Código · 3.5K visitas mensuales

TopDev es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que ayuda a las empresas a contratar a los mejores desarrolladores analizando sus perfiles de GitHub. Evalúa habilidades técnicas, fiabilidad y consistencia para proporcionar información detallada, agilizando el proceso de contratación y ahorrando un tiempo significativo a los equipos de RR.HH. y a las startups.

Lever vs TopDev: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara Lever y TopDev por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

Lever Resumen del producto

Lever es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que combina un completo Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos (ATS) con robustas capacidades de Gestión de Relaciones con Candidatos (CRM). Simplifica todo el proceso de contratación, desde la búsqueda y selección hasta las entrevistas y la construcción de relaciones, para equipos de todos los tamaños. Su suite de AI Companions ayuda a automatizar tareas, reducir sesgos e identificar a los mejores candidatos más rápidamente.

Preview

TopDev Resumen del producto

TopDev es una plataforma de reclutamiento impulsada por IA que ayuda a las empresas a contratar a los mejores desarrolladores analizando sus perfiles de GitHub. Evalúa habilidades técnicas, fiabilidad y consistencia para proporcionar información detallada, agilizando el proceso de contratación y ahorrando un tiempo significativo a los equipos de RR.HH. y a las startups.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureLeverTopDev
Categoría principalGestión del TalentoAnálisis de Código
Añadido2025-08-172025-08-11
PrecioDe pagoFreemium
Sitio oficialwww.lever.cowww.topdev.online
Tipo de productoSitio webSitio web
Performance data
ValoraciónSin verificarSin verificar
Comentarios00
Visitas mensuales11.8M3.5K
Crecimiento mensual-7.4%Sin verificar
Favoritos10798
DetailsVer detallesVer detalles

Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic

Compare Lever and TopDev by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Lever monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
11.8M
Duración media
3:28
Páginas por visita
3.36
Tasa de rebote
41.78%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 12.9M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 13.8M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 12.9M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 13.5M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 12.7M Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 11.8M Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States68.35%8M
🇮🇳India16.91%2M
🇨🇦Canada6.68%786.3K
🇬🇧United Kingdom5.35%629.7K
🇫🇷France2.71%319K

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo58.95%6.9M
Referido36.32%4.3M
Correo electrónico4.73%556.7K

Palabras clave

crowdgenenebaleverlever jobspaytm

TopDev monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
3.5K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Lever and TopDev

Lever Core features

Reclutamiento
Gestión del Talento
Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo

TopDev Core features

Reclutamiento
Análisis de Código
Búsqueda de Talento

Use cases

Lever Use cases

Reclutamiento de IA
Contratación
Tecnología de RRHH
Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos
ATS
Gestión de Candidatos
CRM
recursos humanos
Reclutamiento
adquisición de talento

TopDev Use cases

Reclutamiento de IA
Contratación
Tecnología de RRHH
Búsqueda de candidatos
Contratación de Desarrolladores
Análisis de GitHub
Búsqueda de talento
Cribado técnico

Lever vs TopDev:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Lever vs TopDev comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Lever is primarily listed under “Gestión del Talento”, while TopDev is primarily listed under “Análisis de Código”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Lever: Gestión del Talento; TopDev: Análisis de Código); Pricing (Lever: Paid; TopDev: Freemium); Monthly visits (Lever: 11.8M; TopDev: 3.5K); Favorites (Lever: 107; TopDev: 98); Website (Lever: www.lever.co; TopDev: www.topdev.online). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Lever and TopDev currently overlap in shared categories: Reclutamiento; shared tags: Reclutamiento de IA, Contratación y Tecnología de RRHH. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Lever's unique categories/tags are Gestión del Talento, Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos, CRM, recursos humanos y Reclutamiento; TopDev's are Análisis de Código, Búsqueda de Talento, Búsqueda de candidatos, Contratación de Desarrolladores, Análisis de GitHub, Búsqueda de talento y Cribado técnico. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Lever has no verified rating, 0 comments, 107 favorites, and 97 likes;TopDev has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 106 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Lever first

Put Lever on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestión del Talento” and especially Gestión del Talento, Automatización de Flujo de Trabajo, Sistema de Seguimiento de Candidatos, ATS, Gestión de Candidatos y CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Lever also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 11.8M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate TopDev first

Put TopDev on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Análisis de Código” and especially Análisis de Código, Búsqueda de Talento, Búsqueda de candidatos, Contratación de Desarrolladores, Análisis de GitHub y Búsqueda de talento. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

TopDev also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.5K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Lever and TopDev, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between Lever and TopDev?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.