Déploiement de modèle · 210.5K visites mensuelles

Flowise est une plateforme open-source et low-code pour construire visuellement des agents et des applications d'IA personnalisés. En utilisant une interface de glisser-déposer, les développeurs et les équipes peuvent prototyper et déployer rapidement des systèmes complexes, des chatbots basés sur RAG aux flux de travail multi-agents. Il prend en charge plus de 100 LLM, diverses sources de données et offre des fonctionnalités de niveau entreprise pour un déploiement évolutif.

Visiter le site Voir les détails

Langflow

Low-code No-code · 243.6K visites mensuelles

Langflow est une interface utilisateur visuelle open-source pour créer et déployer des applications d'IA. Elle dispose d'une interface glisser-déposer pour enchaîner les LLM, les agents et les outils, permettant un prototypage et un déploiement rapides de flux de travail complexes comme les systèmes RAG et multi-agents. Elle prend en charge de nombreuses intégrations et offre des options auto-hébergées et cloud.

Visiter le site Voir les détails

Flowise vs Langflow : prix, fonctions et trafic

Comparez Flowise et Langflow selon leur positionnement, prix, fonctions, trafic et avis.

Mis à jour 5 août 2026

Aperçu du produit

Flowise Aperçu du produit

Preview

Langflow Aperçu du produit

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

Feature	Flowise	Langflow
Catégorie principale	Déploiement de modèle	Low-code No-code
Ajouté	2025-08-08	2025-08-14
Tarification	Freemium	Freemium
Site officiel	flowiseai.com	www.langflow.org
Type de produit	Site web	Site web
Performance data
Note utilisateur	Non vérifié	Non vérifié
Commentaires	0	0
Visites mensuelles	210.5K	243.6K
Croissance mensuelle	-5.9%	6.2%
Favoris	119	69
Details	Voir les détails	Voir les détails

Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic

Compare Flowise and Langflow by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Flowise vs Langflow monthly traffic comparison, Flowise currently shows 210.5K visits and Langflow shows 243.6K; Langflow has about 1.2 times the visible traffic of Flowise, an absolute difference of about 33.1K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Flowise monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles

210.5K

Durée moyenne

1:55

Pages par visite

3.71

Taux de rebond

40.16%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇮🇳India	34.54%	72.7K
🇺🇸United States	25%	52.6K
🇸🇬Singapore	14.48%	30.5K
🇻🇳Vietnam	14.48%	30.5K
🇩🇪Germany	11.5%	24.2K

Sources de trafic

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Direct	71.85%	151.3K
Référence	27.25%	57.4K
E-mail	0.9%	1.9K

Mots-clés

flowiseflowise aiflowiseaiflowiseai apiflowwise

Langflow monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles

243.6K

Durée moyenne

1:09

Pages par visite

1.95

Taux de rebond

44.67%

Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions

Country/region	Percentage	Traffic
🇨🇳China	42.24%	102.9K
🇮🇳India	18.05%	44K
🇺🇸United States	16.88%	41.1K
🇮🇩Indonesia	16.72%	40.7K
🇬🇧United Kingdom	6.11%	14.9K

Sources de trafic

Source type	Percentage	Traffic
Direct	78.32%	190.8K
Référence	20.42%	49.7K
E-mail	1.26%	3.1K

Mots-clés

composiolangflowlangfuseopenrouterpdf to markdown

Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Flowise and Langflow

Flowise Core features

Low-code No-code

Déploiement de modèle

Automatisation des Flux de Travail

Chatbot

Langflow Core features

Low-code No-code

Automatisation des Flux de Travail

Use cases

Flowise Use cases

Agent IA

Outils pour développeurs

low-code

Systèmes multi-agents

No-code

Open source

Génération Augmentée par Récupération

Constructeur visuel

automatisation des flux de travail

Constructeur de chatbot

LangChain

Langflow Use cases

Agent IA

Outils pour développeurs

low-code

Systèmes multi-agents

No-code

Open source

Génération Augmentée par Récupération

Constructeur visuel

automatisation des flux de travail

API

Grand modèle linguistique

Flowise vs Langflow：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Flowise vs Langflow comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Flowise is primarily listed under “Déploiement de modèle”, while Langflow is primarily listed under “Low-code No-code”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Flowise: Déploiement de modèle; Langflow: Low-code No-code); Monthly visits (Flowise: 210.5K; Langflow: 243.6K); Monthly growth (Flowise: -5.9%; Langflow: 6.2%); Favorites (Flowise: 119; Langflow: 69); Website (Flowise: flowiseai.com; Langflow: www.langflow.org). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Flowise and Langflow currently overlap in shared categories: Low-code No-code; shared tags: Agent IA, Outils pour développeurs, low-code, Systèmes multi-agents, No-code, Open source, Génération Augmentée par Récupération, Constructeur visuel et automatisation des flux de travail. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Flowise's unique categories/tags are Déploiement de modèle, Automatisation des Flux de Travail, Chatbot, Constructeur de chatbot et LangChain; Langflow's are Automatisation des Flux de Travail, API et Grand modèle linguistique. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Flowise has no verified rating, 0 comments, 119 favorites, and 134 likes；Langflow has no verified rating, 0 comments, 69 favorites, and 77 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Flowise first

Put Flowise on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Déploiement de modèle” and especially Déploiement de modèle, Automatisation des Flux de Travail, Chatbot, Constructeur de chatbot et LangChain. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Flowise also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 210.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Langflow first

Put Langflow on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Low-code No-code” and especially Automatisation des Flux de Travail, API et Grand modèle linguistique. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Langflow also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 243.6K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Flowise and Langflow, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ comparative

How should I choose between Flowise and Langflow?

Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.

Where does this comparison data come from?

The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.

What do unknown fields mean?

Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.