ToolMage
Connexion
Lever
Gestion des talents · 11.8M visites mensuelles

Lever est une plateforme de recrutement optimisée par l'IA qui combine un système de suivi des candidats (ATS) complet avec de solides capacités de gestion de la relation candidat (CRM). Elle rationalise l'ensemble du processus de recrutement, de la recherche et de la sélection aux entretiens et à la création de relations, pour les équipes de toutes tailles. Sa suite d'AI Companions aide à automatiser les tâches, à réduire les biais et à identifier plus rapidement les meilleurs candidats.

Visiter le siteVoir les détails
VS
TopDev
Analyse de Code · 3.5K visites mensuelles

TopDev est une plateforme de recrutement alimentée par l'IA qui aide les entreprises à embaucher les meilleurs développeurs en analysant leurs profils GitHub. Elle évalue les compétences techniques, la fiabilité et la constance pour fournir des informations approfondies, rationalisant ainsi le processus de recrutement et faisant gagner un temps considérable aux équipes RH et aux startups.

Visiter le siteVoir les détails

Lever vs TopDev : prix, fonctions et trafic

Comparez Lever et TopDev selon leur positionnement, prix, fonctions, trafic et avis.

Mis à jour 5 août 2026

Aperçu du produit

Lever Aperçu du produit

Lever est une plateforme de recrutement optimisée par l'IA qui combine un système de suivi des candidats (ATS) complet avec de solides capacités de gestion de la relation candidat (CRM). Elle rationalise l'ensemble du processus de recrutement, de la recherche et de la sélection aux entretiens et à la création de relations, pour les équipes de toutes tailles. Sa suite d'AI Companions aide à automatiser les tâches, à réduire les biais et à identifier plus rapidement les meilleurs candidats.

Preview

TopDev Aperçu du produit

TopDev est une plateforme de recrutement alimentée par l'IA qui aide les entreprises à embaucher les meilleurs développeurs en analysant leurs profils GitHub. Elle évalue les compétences techniques, la fiabilité et la constance pour fournir des informations approfondies, rationalisant ainsi le processus de recrutement et faisant gagner un temps considérable aux équipes RH et aux startups.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureLeverTopDev
Catégorie principaleGestion des talentsAnalyse de Code
Ajouté2025-08-172025-08-11
TarificationPayantFreemium
Site officielwww.lever.cowww.topdev.online
Type de produitSite webSite web
Performance data
Note utilisateurNon vérifiéNon vérifié
Commentaires00
Visites mensuelles11.8M3.5K
Croissance mensuelle-7.4%Non vérifié
Favoris10798
DetailsVoir les détailsVoir les détails

Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic

Compare Lever and TopDev by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Lever monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
11.8M
Durée moyenne
3:28
Pages par visite
3.36
Taux de rebond
41.78%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 12.9M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/1: 13.8M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/2: 12.9M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/3: 13.5M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/4: 12.7M Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/5: 11.8M Visites mensuelles

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States68.35%8M
🇮🇳India16.91%2M
🇨🇦Canada6.68%786.3K
🇬🇧United Kingdom5.35%629.7K
🇫🇷France2.71%319K

Sources de trafic

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direct58.95%6.9M
Référence36.32%4.3M
E-mail4.73%556.7K

Mots-clés

crowdgenenebaleverlever jobspaytm

TopDev monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
3.5K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Lever and TopDev

Lever Core features

Recrutement
Gestion des talents
Automatisation des Flux de Travail

TopDev Core features

Recrutement
Analyse de Code
Sourcing de talents

Use cases

Lever Use cases

Recrutement IA
Recrutement
Technologies RH
Système de Suivi des Candidats
ATS
Gestion des Candidats
CRM
ressources humaines
acquisition de talents

TopDev Use cases

Recrutement IA
Recrutement
Technologies RH
Sourcing de candidats
Recrutement de développeurs
Analyse GitHub
Sourcing de talents
Sélection technique

Lever vs TopDev：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Lever vs TopDev comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Lever is primarily listed under “Gestion des talents”, while TopDev is primarily listed under “Analyse de Code”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Lever: Gestion des talents; TopDev: Analyse de Code); Pricing (Lever: Paid; TopDev: Freemium); Monthly visits (Lever: 11.8M; TopDev: 3.5K); Favorites (Lever: 107; TopDev: 98); Website (Lever: www.lever.co; TopDev: www.topdev.online). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Lever and TopDev currently overlap in shared categories: Recrutement; shared tags: Recrutement IA, Recrutement et Technologies RH. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Lever's unique categories/tags are Gestion des talents, Automatisation des Flux de Travail, Système de Suivi des Candidats, ATS, Gestion des Candidats, CRM, ressources humaines et Recrutement; TopDev's are Analyse de Code, Sourcing de talents, Sourcing de candidats, Recrutement de développeurs, Analyse GitHub et Sélection technique. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Lever has no verified rating, 0 comments, 107 favorites, and 97 likes；TopDev has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 106 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Lever first

Put Lever on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestion des talents” and especially Gestion des talents, Automatisation des Flux de Travail, Système de Suivi des Candidats, ATS, Gestion des Candidats et CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Lever also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 11.8M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate TopDev first

Put TopDev on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Analyse de Code” and especially Analyse de Code, Sourcing de talents, Sourcing de candidats, Recrutement de développeurs, Analyse GitHub et Sélection technique. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

TopDev also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.5K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Lever and TopDev, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ comparative

How should I choose between Lever and TopDev?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.