ToolMage
ログイン
CustomJS
バックエンド · 19K 月間訪問数

CustomJSは、ノーコードとカスタム開発のギャップを埋める強力なプラットフォームです。Make、Zapier、Airtableなどのお気に入りの自動化プラットフォーム内でJavaScriptを実行し、NPMモジュールを使用し、カスタムロジックを統合できます。独自のサーバーを管理することなく、PDF生成、ウェブスクレイピング、API作成などの高度な機能を利用できます。

VS
Make
CRM · 6.7M 月間訪問数

Makeは、コード不要で簡単なタスクから複雑なワークフローまで、あらゆるものを設計、構築、自動化できる強力なビジュアルプラットフォームです。OpenAIやGoogle Geminiなどの高度なAIツールを含む数千のアプリやサービスを接続し、ビジネスオペレーション、マーケティング、セールスなどを効率化するインテリジェントな自動化やAIエージェントを作成できます。

CustomJS vs Make:価格・機能・トラフィック比較

製品情報、分類、トラフィック、ユーザー反応に基づいて CustomJS と Make を比較します。

更新 2026/08/05

製品概要

CustomJS 製品概要

CustomJSは、ノーコードとカスタム開発のギャップを埋める強力なプラットフォームです。Make、Zapier、Airtableなどのお気に入りの自動化プラットフォーム内でJavaScriptを実行し、NPMモジュールを使用し、カスタムロジックを統合できます。独自のサーバーを管理することなく、PDF生成、ウェブスクレイピング、API作成などの高度な機能を利用できます。

Preview

Make 製品概要

Makeは、コード不要で簡単なタスクから複雑なワークフローまで、あらゆるものを設計、構築、自動化できる強力なビジュアルプラットフォームです。OpenAIやGoogle Geminiなどの高度なAIツールを含む数千のアプリやサービスを接続し、ビジネスオペレーション、マーケティング、セールスなどを効率化するインテリジェントな自動化やAIエージェントを作成できます。

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureCustomJSMake
主要カテゴリーバックエンドCRM
追加日2025-08-022025-08-08
価格フリーミアムフリーミアム
公式サイトwww.customjs.spacewww.make.com
製品タイプウェブサイトウェブサイト
Performance data
ユーザー評価未確認未確認
コメント00
月間訪問数19K6.7M
月間成長率-6.4%12.7%
お気に入り126122
Details詳細を見る詳細を見る

CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic

Compare CustomJS and Make by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic comparison, CustomJS currently shows 19K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 352.9 times the visible traffic of CustomJS, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

CustomJS monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

月間訪問数
19K
平均滞在時間
0:25
訪問あたりページ数
2.08
直帰率
38.59%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 16.8K 月間訪問数
  • 2026/1: 17.6K 月間訪問数
  • 2026/2: 13.4K 月間訪問数
  • 2026/3: 21.9K 月間訪問数
  • 2026/4: 20.2K 月間訪問数
  • 2026/5: 19K 月間訪問数

主要地域

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States46.23%8.8K
🇮🇳India18.79%3.6K
🇮🇩Indonesia15.07%2.9K
🇵🇰Pakistan9.96%1.9K
🇧🇷Brazil9.95%1.9K

検索キーワード

custom jshtml to pdfinvoice generator online htmltypescript fetch called from power automateworkflows n8n product knowledge dari pdf

Make monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

月間訪問数
6.7M
平均滞在時間
7:28
訪問あたりページ数
8.43
直帰率
32.56%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/1: 5.4M 月間訪問数
  • 2026/2: 5M 月間訪問数
  • 2026/3: 6.1M 月間訪問数
  • 2026/4: 5.9M 月間訪問数
  • 2026/5: 6.7M 月間訪問数

主要地域

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States40.62%2.7M
🇮🇳India19.69%1.3M
🇫🇷France18.85%1.3M
🇩🇪Germany11.09%741.7K
🇮🇱Israel9.75%652.1K

流入元

Source typePercentageTraffic
ダイレクト90.82%6.1M
参照元6.17%412.7K
Eメール3.01%201.3K

検索キーワード

gemini aimakemake aimake.comn8n
Traffic-based selection guidance: Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of CustomJS and Make

CustomJS Core features

ノーコード
自動化
バックエンド

Make Core features

ノーコード
自動化
CRM
マーケティングオートメーション

Use cases

CustomJS Use cases

API
自動化
ノーコード
開発者ツール
JavaScript
作成
PDF生成
サーバーレス
ワークフロー自動化
ザピアー

Make Use cases

API
自動化
ノーコード
AIエージェント
チャットボット
データ同期
統合
iPaaS
マーケティングオートメーション
生産性
ワークフロー

CustomJS vs Make:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth CustomJS vs Make comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. CustomJS is primarily listed under “バックエンド”, while Make is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (CustomJS: バックエンド; Make: CRM); Monthly visits (CustomJS: 19K; Make: 6.7M); Monthly growth (CustomJS: -6.4%; Make: 12.7%); Favorites (CustomJS: 126; Make: 122); Website (CustomJS: www.customjs.space; Make: www.make.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic comparison, CustomJS currently shows 19K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 352.9 times the visible traffic of CustomJS, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

CustomJS and Make currently overlap in shared categories: ノーコード、自動化; shared tags: API、自動化、ノーコード. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

CustomJS's unique categories/tags are バックエンド、開発者ツール、JavaScript、作成、PDF生成、サーバーレス、ワークフロー自動化、ザピアー; Make's are CRM、マーケティングオートメーション、AIエージェント、チャットボット、データ同期、統合、iPaaS、生産性. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

CustomJS has no verified rating, 0 comments, 126 favorites, and 124 likes;Make has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 125 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate CustomJS first

Put CustomJS on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “バックエンド” and especially バックエンド、開発者ツール、JavaScript、作成、PDF生成、サーバーレス. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

CustomJS also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 19K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Make first

Put Make on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially CRM、マーケティングオートメーション、AIエージェント、チャットボット、データ同期、統合. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Make also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 6.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in CustomJS and Make, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

比較 FAQ

How should I choose between CustomJS and Make?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.