HelloVacancy
採用 · 3.3K 月間訪問数
HelloVacancyは、小規模チームや企業向けに設計されたスマートで無料の採用プラットフォームです。公開求人掲載やGoogleフォーム連携から、候補者追跡、チームフィードバック収集、コミュニケーション管理まで、採用プロセス全体を1つの直感的なダッシュボードで効率化します。手作業を排除し、採用を簡素化することを目指しています。
製品概要
HelloVacancy 製品概要
HelloVacancyは、小規模チームや企業向けに設計されたスマートで無料の採用プラットフォームです。公開求人掲載やGoogleフォーム連携から、候補者追跡、チームフィードバック収集、コミュニケーション管理まで、採用プロセス全体を1つの直感的なダッシュボードで効率化します。手作業を排除し、採用を簡素化することを目指しています。
Preview
Hollo 製品概要
Holloは、採用プロセス全体を合理化するために設計された、オールインワンの協調型採用ソフトウェア（ATS）です。マルチ投稿、自動化されたワークフロー、一元化されたタレントプール、洞察に満ちた分析などの機能を通じて、人事専門家やチームが時間を節約し、候補者体験を向上させ、エンプロイヤーブランドを強化するのを支援します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | HelloVacancy | Hollo |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 採用 | CRM |
| 追加日 | 2025-11-13 | 2025-08-05 |
| 価格 | 無料 | 有料 |
| 公式サイト | hellovacancy.com | www.hollo.io |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 3.3K | 109 |
| 月間成長率 | 未確認 | 17.2% |
| お気に入り | 136 | 125 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
HelloVacancy vs Hollo monthly traffic
Compare HelloVacancy and Hollo by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the HelloVacancy vs Hollo monthly traffic comparison, HelloVacancy currently shows 3.3K visits and Hollo shows 109; HelloVacancy has about 30.3 times the visible traffic of Hollo, an absolute difference of about 3.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Hollo has complete third-party traffic details; HelloVacancy uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
HelloVacancy monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
3.3K
Hollo monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
109
平均滞在時間
4:26
訪問あたりページ数
3
直帰率
0%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 284 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 1.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 644 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 93 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 109 月間訪問数
検索キーワード
holloholló
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of HelloVacancy and Hollo
HelloVacancy Core features
ワークフロー自動化
採用
Hollo Core features
ワークフロー自動化
CRM
採用
Use cases
HelloVacancy Use cases
採用管理システム
ATS
候補者管理
HRテック
採用ソフトウェア
人材獲得
無料採用ツール
Googleフォーム連携
採用プラットフォーム
求人情報
中小企業の人事
チームコラボレーション
ワークフロー自動化
Hollo Use cases
採用管理システム
ATS
候補者管理
HRテック
採用ソフトウェア
人材獲得
共同採用
雇用主ブランディング
採用
Best suited roles
HelloVacancy Best suited roles
採用担当者
人事マネージャー
業務マネージャー
リクルーター
中小企業経営者
チームリーダー
Hollo Best suited roles
確認済みデータなし
HelloVacancy vs Hollo：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth HelloVacancy vs Hollo comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. HelloVacancy is primarily listed under “採用”, while Hollo is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (HelloVacancy: 採用; Hollo: CRM); Pricing (HelloVacancy: Free; Hollo: Paid); Monthly visits (HelloVacancy: 3.3K; Hollo: 109); Favorites (HelloVacancy: 136; Hollo: 125); Website (HelloVacancy: hellovacancy.com; Hollo: www.hollo.io). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the HelloVacancy vs Hollo monthly traffic comparison, HelloVacancy currently shows 3.3K visits and Hollo shows 109; HelloVacancy has about 30.3 times the visible traffic of Hollo, an absolute difference of about 3.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Hollo has complete third-party traffic details; HelloVacancy uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
HelloVacancy and Hollo currently overlap in shared categories: ワークフロー自動化; shared tags: 採用管理システム、ATS、候補者管理、HRテック、採用ソフトウェア、人材獲得. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
HelloVacancy's unique categories/tags are 採用、無料採用ツール、Googleフォーム連携、採用プラットフォーム、求人情報、中小企業の人事、チームコラボレーション、ワークフロー自動化; Hollo's are CRM、採用、共同採用、雇用主ブランディング. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
HelloVacancy has no verified rating, 0 comments, 136 favorites, and 120 likes；Hollo has no verified rating, 0 comments, 125 favorites, and 116 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate HelloVacancy first
Put HelloVacancy on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “採用” and especially 採用、無料採用ツール、Googleフォーム連携、採用プラットフォーム、求人情報、中小企業の人事, or the users include 採用担当者、人事マネージャー、業務マネージャー、リクルーター. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
HelloVacancy also currently records: pricing is free, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Hollo first
Put Hollo on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially CRM、採用、共同採用、雇用主ブランディング. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Hollo also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 109 verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in HelloVacancy and Hollo, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between HelloVacancy and Hollo?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.