HelloVacancyは、小規模チームや企業向けに設計されたスマートで無料の採用プラットフォームです。公開求人掲載やGoogleフォーム連携から、候補者追跡、チームフィードバック収集、コミュニケーション管理まで、採用プロセス全体を1つの直感的なダッシュボードで効率化します。手作業を排除し、採用を簡素化することを目指しています。
製品概要
HelloVacancy 製品概要
HelloVacancyは、小規模チームや企業向けに設計されたスマートで無料の採用プラットフォームです。公開求人掲載やGoogleフォーム連携から、候補者追跡、チームフィードバック収集、コミュニケーション管理まで、採用プロセス全体を1つの直感的なダッシュボードで効率化します。手作業を排除し、採用を簡素化することを目指しています。
Screenz 製品概要
Screenzは、初期の候補者スクリーニングプロセスを自動化するAI搭載のビデオ面接プラットフォームです。動的で構造化されたビデオ面接を通じて、企業が応募者を評価、スクリーニング、採点するのを支援し、時間を大幅に節約し、偏見を減らし、採用決定を加速させます。
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | HelloVacancy | Screenz |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 採用 | 採用 |
| 追加日 | 2025-11-13 | 2025-10-23 |
| 価格 | 無料 | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | hellovacancy.com | www.screenz.ai |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 3.3K | 3.6K |
| 月間成長率 | 未確認 | 80.2% |
| お気に入り | 136 | 119 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
HelloVacancy vs Screenz monthly traffic
Compare HelloVacancy and Screenz by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the HelloVacancy vs Screenz monthly traffic comparison, HelloVacancy currently shows 3.3K visits and Screenz shows 3.6K; Screenz has about 1.1 times the visible traffic of HelloVacancy, an absolute difference of about 346 visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Screenz has complete third-party traffic details; HelloVacancy uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
HelloVacancy monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Screenz monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 1.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 0 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 358 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 1.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 2K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 3.6K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 100% | 3.6K |
検索キーワード
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of HelloVacancy and Screenz
HelloVacancy Core features
Screenz Core features
Use cases
HelloVacancy Use cases
Screenz Use cases
Best suited roles
HelloVacancy Best suited roles
Screenz Best suited roles
HelloVacancy vs Screenz:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth HelloVacancy vs Screenz comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. HelloVacancy is primarily listed under “採用”, while Screenz is primarily listed under “採用”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (HelloVacancy: Free; Screenz: Freemium); Monthly visits (HelloVacancy: 3.3K; Screenz: 3.6K); Favorites (HelloVacancy: 136; Screenz: 119); Website (HelloVacancy: hellovacancy.com; Screenz: www.screenz.ai); Added (HelloVacancy: 2025-11-13; Screenz: 2025-10-23). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the HelloVacancy vs Screenz monthly traffic comparison, HelloVacancy currently shows 3.3K visits and Screenz shows 3.6K; Screenz has about 1.1 times the visible traffic of HelloVacancy, an absolute difference of about 346 visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Screenz has complete third-party traffic details; HelloVacancy uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
HelloVacancy and Screenz currently overlap in shared categories: 採用; shared tags: 採用ソフトウェア、人材獲得; shared roles: 採用担当者、人事マネージャー、業務マネージャー、リクルーター. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
HelloVacancy's unique categories/tags are ワークフロー自動化、採用管理システム、ATS、候補者管理、無料採用ツール、Googleフォーム連携、採用プラットフォーム、HRテック; Screenz's are 自動化、AI面接、採用管理システム連携、自動採用、バイアス軽減、候補者スクリーニング、不正行為検出、グローバル採用. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
HelloVacancy has no verified rating, 0 comments, 136 favorites, and 120 likes;Screenz has no verified rating, 0 comments, 119 favorites, and 119 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate HelloVacancy first
Put HelloVacancy on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “採用” and especially ワークフロー自動化、採用管理システム、ATS、候補者管理、無料採用ツール、Googleフォーム連携, or the users include 中小企業経営者、チームリーダー. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
HelloVacancy also currently records: pricing is free, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Screenz first
Put Screenz on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “採用” and especially 自動化、AI面接、採用管理システム連携、自動採用、バイアス軽減、候補者スクリーニング, or the users include 事業主、最高経営責任者、タレントアクイジションスペシャリスト. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Screenz also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.6K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in HelloVacancy and Screenz, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




