itsimpleは、ビジネスプロセスの自動化を簡素化するAI搭載のノーコードプラットフォームです。ユーザーはコードを書くことなく、様々なアプリケーションを接続し、反復作業を自動化し、複雑なワークフローを作成でき、あらゆる規模のチームの生産性と運用効率を向上させます。
Makeは、コード不要で簡単なタスクから複雑なワークフローまで、あらゆるものを設計、構築、自動化できる強力なビジュアルプラットフォームです。OpenAIやGoogle Geminiなどの高度なAIツールを含む数千のアプリやサービスを接続し、ビジネスオペレーション、マーケティング、セールスなどを効率化するインテリジェントな自動化やAIエージェントを作成できます。
製品概要
itsimple 製品概要
itsimpleは、ビジネスプロセスの自動化を簡素化するAI搭載のノーコードプラットフォームです。ユーザーはコードを書くことなく、様々なアプリケーションを接続し、反復作業を自動化し、複雑なワークフローを作成でき、あらゆる規模のチームの生産性と運用効率を向上させます。
Make 製品概要
Makeは、コード不要で簡単なタスクから複雑なワークフローまで、あらゆるものを設計、構築、自動化できる強力なビジュアルプラットフォームです。OpenAIやGoogle Geminiなどの高度なAIツールを含む数千のアプリやサービスを接続し、ビジネスオペレーション、マーケティング、セールスなどを効率化するインテリジェントな自動化やAIエージェントを作成できます。
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | itsimple | Make |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | データ統合 | CRM |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-03 | 2025-08-08 |
| 価格 | フリーミアム | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | app.itsimple.ai | www.make.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 3.4K | 6.7M |
| 月間成長率 | 未確認 | 12.7% |
| お気に入り | 100 | 122 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
itsimple vs Make monthly traffic
Compare itsimple and Make by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the itsimple vs Make monthly traffic comparison, itsimple currently shows 3.4K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 1,978.1 times the visible traffic of itsimple, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Make has complete third-party traffic details; itsimple uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
itsimple monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Make monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 5.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 5M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 6.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 5.9M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 6.7M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 40.62% | 2.7M |
| 🇮🇳India | 19.69% | 1.3M |
| 🇫🇷France | 18.85% | 1.3M |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 11.09% | 741.7K |
| 🇮🇱Israel | 9.75% | 652.1K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 90.82% | 6.1M |
| 参照元 | 6.17% | 412.7K |
| Eメール | 3.01% | 201.3K |
検索キーワード
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of itsimple and Make
itsimple Core features
Make Core features
Use cases
itsimple Use cases
Make Use cases
itsimple vs Make:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth itsimple vs Make comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. itsimple is primarily listed under “データ統合”, while Make is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (itsimple: データ統合; Make: CRM); Monthly visits (itsimple: 3.4K; Make: 6.7M); Favorites (itsimple: 100; Make: 122); Website (itsimple: app.itsimple.ai; Make: www.make.com); Added (itsimple: 2025-08-03; Make: 2025-08-08). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the itsimple vs Make monthly traffic comparison, itsimple currently shows 3.4K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 1,978.1 times the visible traffic of itsimple, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Make has complete third-party traffic details; itsimple uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
itsimple and Make currently overlap in shared categories: ノーコード、マーケティングオートメーション; shared tags: API、自動化、統合、ノーコード、生産性、ワークフロー. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
itsimple's unique categories/tags are データ統合、ワークフロー自動化、ビジネスプロセス、データ管理、代替案を作成する、Zapierの代替; Make's are CRM、自動化、AIエージェント、チャットボット、データ同期、iPaaS、マーケティングオートメーション. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
itsimple has no verified rating, 0 comments, 100 favorites, and 109 likes;Make has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 125 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate itsimple first
Put itsimple on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “データ統合” and especially データ統合、ワークフロー自動化、ビジネスプロセス、データ管理、代替案を作成する、Zapierの代替. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
itsimple also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Make first
Put Make on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially CRM、自動化、AIエージェント、チャットボット、データ同期、iPaaS. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Make also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 6.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in itsimple and Make, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




