Qode
タレントマネジメント · 16.1K 月間訪問数
Qodeは、採用ワークフローを自動化するために設計されたAI採用エンジンです。TracyというAI面接官、広大な候補者データベース、自動エンゲージメントツールを使用して、採用担当者がトップタレントをより速く、より手頃な価格で、偏見なく発掘、選考、採用するのを支援します。
VS
Wellfound
タレントマネジメント · 4.3M 月間訪問数
Wellfound（旧AngelList Talent）は、スタートアップエコシステム向けに設計されたAI搭載の採用プラットフォームです。人工知能を活用して人材ソーシング、履歴書スクリーニング、候補者エンゲージメントを自動化し、企業がトップ技術人材をより迅速に採用できるよう支援します。そのツールスイートであるwellfound:aiは、発見から内定までの採用プロセス全体を効率化します。
製品概要
Qode 製品概要
Qodeは、採用ワークフローを自動化するために設計されたAI採用エンジンです。TracyというAI面接官、広大な候補者データベース、自動エンゲージメントツールを使用して、採用担当者がトップタレントをより速く、より手頃な価格で、偏見なく発掘、選考、採用するのを支援します。
Preview
Wellfound 製品概要
Wellfound（旧AngelList Talent）は、スタートアップエコシステム向けに設計されたAI搭載の採用プラットフォームです。人工知能を活用して人材ソーシング、履歴書スクリーニング、候補者エンゲージメントを自動化し、企業がトップ技術人材をより迅速に採用できるよう支援します。そのツールスイートであるwellfound:aiは、発見から内定までの採用プロセス全体を効率化します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Qode | Wellfound |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | タレントマネジメント | タレントマネジメント |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-05 | 2025-08-02 |
| 価格 | 有料 | フリーミアム |
| 公式サイト | qode.world | wellfound.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 16.1K | 4.3M |
| 月間成長率 | -44.1% | 5.4% |
| お気に入り | 122 | 109 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Qode vs Wellfound monthly traffic
Compare Qode and Wellfound by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Qode vs Wellfound monthly traffic comparison, Qode currently shows 16.1K visits and Wellfound shows 4.3M; Wellfound has about 267 times the visible traffic of Qode, an absolute difference of about 4.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Qode monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
16.1K
平均滞在時間
0:26
訪問あたりページ数
1.55
直帰率
51.84%
Data updated 2026-06-11
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 42.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 12.8K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 8.5K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 14.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 28.9K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 16.1K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 39.8% | 6.4K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 35.55% | 5.7K |
| 🇮🇳India | 20.46% | 3.3K |
| 🇯🇵Japan | 3.72% | 601 |
| 🇹🇷Turkey | 0.47% | 76 |
検索キーワード
qodeqode finance managerquodetracy ai interviewtracy aiinterview
Wellfound monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
4.3M
平均滞在時間
5:09
訪問あたりページ数
6.46
直帰率
35.38%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 3.6M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 4.4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 4M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 4.3M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 4.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 4.3M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳India | 57.2% | 2.5M |
| 🇺🇸United States | 35.29% | 1.5M |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 3.19% | 137.5K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 2.49% | 107.3K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 1.83% | 78.9K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 83.35% | 3.6M |
| Eメール | 9.8% | 422.5K |
| 参照元 | 6.85% | 295.3K |
検索キーワード
angellistwelfoundwell foundwellfoundwellfound jobs
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Wellfound first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Qode and Wellfound
Qode Core features
タレントマネジメント
採用
自動化
Wellfound Core features
タレントマネジメント
採用
自動化
Use cases
Qode Use cases
ATS
候補者ソーシング
採用
人材獲得
AI面接官
自動化
偏りのない採用
HRテック
Wellfound Use cases
ATS
候補者ソーシング
採用
人材獲得
人事
履歴書スクリーニング
スタートアップの仕事
テック系求人
Qode vs Wellfound：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Qode vs Wellfound comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Qode is primarily listed under “タレントマネジメント”, while Wellfound is primarily listed under “タレントマネジメント”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Qode: Paid; Wellfound: Freemium); Monthly visits (Qode: 16.1K; Wellfound: 4.3M); Monthly growth (Qode: -44.1%; Wellfound: 5.4%); Favorites (Qode: 122; Wellfound: 109); Website (Qode: qode.world; Wellfound: wellfound.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Qode vs Wellfound monthly traffic comparison, Qode currently shows 16.1K visits and Wellfound shows 4.3M; Wellfound has about 267 times the visible traffic of Qode, an absolute difference of about 4.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Wellfound first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Qode and Wellfound currently overlap in shared categories: タレントマネジメント、採用、自動化; shared tags: ATS、候補者ソーシング、採用、人材獲得. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Qode's unique categories/tags are AI面接官、自動化、偏りのない採用、HRテック; Wellfound's are 人事、履歴書スクリーニング、スタートアップの仕事、テック系求人. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Qode has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 105 likes；Wellfound has no verified rating, 0 comments, 109 favorites, and 111 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Qode first
Put Qode on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “タレントマネジメント” and especially AI面接官、自動化、偏りのない採用、HRテック. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Qode also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 16.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Wellfound first
Put Wellfound on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “タレントマネジメント” and especially 人事、履歴書スクリーニング、スタートアップの仕事、テック系求人. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Wellfound also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 4.3M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Qode and Wellfound, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Qode and Wellfound?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.