CustomJS
백엔드 · 19K 월 방문
CustomJS는 노코드와 맞춤 개발 간의 격차를 해소하는 강력한 플랫폼입니다. Make, Zapier, Airtable과 같은 즐겨 사용하는 자동화 플랫폼에서 JavaScript를 실행하고, NPM 모듈을 사용하며, 맞춤 로직을 통합할 수 있습니다. 자체 서버 관리 없이 PDF 생성, 웹 스크래핑, API 생성과 같은 고급 기능을 활용하세요.
VS
Make
CRM · 6.7M 월 방문
Make는 코딩 없이 간단한 작업부터 복잡한 워크플로우까지 모든 것을 설계, 구축 및 자동화할 수 있는 강력한 시각적 플랫폼입니다. OpenAI 및 Google Gemini와 같은 고급 AI 도구를 포함하여 수천 개의 앱과 서비스를 연결하여 비즈니스 운영, 마케팅, 영업 등을 간소화하는 지능형 자동화 및 AI 에이전트를 만들 수 있습니다.
제품 개요
CustomJS 제품 개요
CustomJS는 노코드와 맞춤 개발 간의 격차를 해소하는 강력한 플랫폼입니다. Make, Zapier, Airtable과 같은 즐겨 사용하는 자동화 플랫폼에서 JavaScript를 실행하고, NPM 모듈을 사용하며, 맞춤 로직을 통합할 수 있습니다. 자체 서버 관리 없이 PDF 생성, 웹 스크래핑, API 생성과 같은 고급 기능을 활용하세요.
Preview
Make 제품 개요
Make는 코딩 없이 간단한 작업부터 복잡한 워크플로우까지 모든 것을 설계, 구축 및 자동화할 수 있는 강력한 시각적 플랫폼입니다. OpenAI 및 Google Gemini와 같은 고급 AI 도구를 포함하여 수천 개의 앱과 서비스를 연결하여 비즈니스 운영, 마케팅, 영업 등을 간소화하는 지능형 자동화 및 AI 에이전트를 만들 수 있습니다.
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | CustomJS | Make |
|---|---|---|
| 주요 카테고리 | 백엔드 | CRM |
| 등록일 | 2025-08-02 | 2025-08-08 |
| 가격 | 프리미엄 | 프리미엄 |
| 공식 사이트 | www.customjs.space | www.make.com |
| 제품 유형 | 웹사이트 | 웹사이트 |
| Performance data | ||
| 사용자 평점 | 확인되지 않음 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 댓글 | 0 | 0 |
| 월 방문 | 19K | 6.7M |
| 월 성장률 | -6.4% | 12.7% |
| 즐겨찾기 | 126 | 122 |
| Details | 상세 보기 | 상세 보기 |
CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic
Compare CustomJS and Make by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic comparison, CustomJS currently shows 19K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 352.9 times the visible traffic of CustomJS, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
CustomJS monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
19K
평균 방문 시간
0:25
방문당 페이지
2.08
이탈률
38.59%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 16.8K 월 방문
- 2026/1: 17.6K 월 방문
- 2026/2: 13.4K 월 방문
- 2026/3: 21.9K 월 방문
- 2026/4: 20.2K 월 방문
- 2026/5: 19K 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 46.23% | 8.8K |
| 🇮🇳India | 18.79% | 3.6K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 15.07% | 2.9K |
| 🇵🇰Pakistan | 9.96% | 1.9K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 9.95% | 1.9K |
검색 키워드
custom jshtml to pdfinvoice generator online htmltypescript fetch called from power automateworkflows n8n product knowledge dari pdf
Make monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
6.7M
평균 방문 시간
7:28
방문당 페이지
8.43
이탈률
32.56%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2026/1: 5.4M 월 방문
- 2026/2: 5M 월 방문
- 2026/3: 6.1M 월 방문
- 2026/4: 5.9M 월 방문
- 2026/5: 6.7M 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 40.62% | 2.7M |
| 🇮🇳India | 19.69% | 1.3M |
| 🇫🇷France | 18.85% | 1.3M |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 11.09% | 741.7K |
| 🇮🇱Israel | 9.75% | 652.1K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 90.82% | 6.1M |
| 리퍼럴 | 6.17% | 412.7K |
| 이메일 | 3.01% | 201.3K |
검색 키워드
gemini aimakemake aimake.comn8n
Traffic-based selection guidance: Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of CustomJS and Make
CustomJS Core features
노코드
자동화
백엔드
Make Core features
노코드
자동화
CRM
마케팅 자동화
Use cases
CustomJS Use cases
API
자동화
노코드
개발자 도구
자바스크립트
만들기
PDF 생성
서버리스
워크플로 자동화
자피어
Make Use cases
API
자동화
노코드
AI 에이전트
챗봇
데이터 동기화
통합
iPaaS
마케팅 자동화
생산성
워크플로우
CustomJS vs Make：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth CustomJS vs Make comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. CustomJS is primarily listed under “백엔드”, while Make is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (CustomJS: 백엔드; Make: CRM); Monthly visits (CustomJS: 19K; Make: 6.7M); Monthly growth (CustomJS: -6.4%; Make: 12.7%); Favorites (CustomJS: 126; Make: 122); Website (CustomJS: www.customjs.space; Make: www.make.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the CustomJS vs Make monthly traffic comparison, CustomJS currently shows 19K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 352.9 times the visible traffic of CustomJS, an absolute difference of about 6.7M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.
Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
CustomJS and Make currently overlap in shared categories: 노코드 및 자동화; shared tags: API, 자동화 및 노코드. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
CustomJS's unique categories/tags are 백엔드, 개발자 도구, 자바스크립트, 만들기, PDF 생성, 서버리스, 워크플로 자동화 및 자피어; Make's are CRM, 마케팅 자동화, AI 에이전트, 챗봇, 데이터 동기화, 통합, iPaaS 및 생산성. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
CustomJS has no verified rating, 0 comments, 126 favorites, and 124 likes；Make has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 125 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate CustomJS first
Put CustomJS on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “백엔드” and especially 백엔드, 개발자 도구, 자바스크립트, 만들기, PDF 생성 및 서버리스. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
CustomJS also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 19K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Make first
Put Make on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially CRM, 마케팅 자동화, AI 에이전트, 챗봇, 데이터 동기화 및 통합. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Make also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 6.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in CustomJS and Make, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
비교 FAQ
How should I choose between CustomJS and Make?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.