Lever
인재 관리 · 11.8M 월 방문
Lever는 완전한 기능을 갖춘 지원자 추적 시스템(ATS)과 강력한 후보자 관계 관리(CRM) 기능을 결합한 AI 기반 채용 플랫폼입니다. 모든 규모의 팀을 위해 소싱 및 스크리닝부터 면접 및 관계 구축에 이르기까지 전체 채용 프로세스를 간소화합니다. AI 컴패니언 제품군은 작업을 자동화하고, 편견을 줄이며, 최고의 후보자를 더 빨리 식별하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
제품 개요
Lever 제품 개요
Lever는 완전한 기능을 갖춘 지원자 추적 시스템(ATS)과 강력한 후보자 관계 관리(CRM) 기능을 결합한 AI 기반 채용 플랫폼입니다. 모든 규모의 팀을 위해 소싱 및 스크리닝부터 면접 및 관계 구축에 이르기까지 전체 채용 프로세스를 간소화합니다. AI 컴패니언 제품군은 작업을 자동화하고, 편견을 줄이며, 최고의 후보자를 더 빨리 식별하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
Preview
TopDev 제품 개요
TopDev는 개발자의 GitHub 프로필을 분석하여 기업이 최고의 개발자를 채용할 수 있도록 돕는 AI 기반 채용 플랫폼입니다. 기술 능력, 신뢰성, 일관성을 평가하여 심층적인 통찰력을 제공함으로써 채용 프로세스를 간소화하고 HR 팀과 스타트업의 시간을 크게 절약해 줍니다.
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Lever | TopDev |
|---|---|---|
| 주요 카테고리 | 인재 관리 | 코드 분석 |
| 등록일 | 2025-08-17 | 2025-08-11 |
| 가격 | 유료 | 프리미엄 |
| 공식 사이트 | www.lever.co | www.topdev.online |
| 제품 유형 | 웹사이트 | 웹사이트 |
| Performance data | ||
| 사용자 평점 | 확인되지 않음 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 댓글 | 0 | 0 |
| 월 방문 | 11.8M | 3.5K |
| 월 성장률 | -7.4% | 확인되지 않음 |
| 즐겨찾기 | 107 | 98 |
| Details | 상세 보기 | 상세 보기 |
Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic
Compare Lever and TopDev by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Lever monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
11.8M
평균 방문 시간
3:28
방문당 페이지
3.36
이탈률
41.78%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 12.9M 월 방문
- 2026/1: 13.8M 월 방문
- 2026/2: 12.9M 월 방문
- 2026/3: 13.5M 월 방문
- 2026/4: 12.7M 월 방문
- 2026/5: 11.8M 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 68.35% | 8M |
| 🇮🇳India | 16.91% | 2M |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 6.68% | 786.3K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 5.35% | 629.7K |
| 🇫🇷France | 2.71% | 319K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 58.95% | 6.9M |
| 리퍼럴 | 36.32% | 4.3M |
| 이메일 | 4.73% | 556.7K |
검색 키워드
crowdgenenebaleverlever jobspaytm
TopDev monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
3.5K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Lever and TopDev
Lever Core features
채용
인재 관리
워크플로우 자동화
TopDev Core features
채용
코드 분석
인재 소싱
Use cases
Lever Use cases
AI 채용
채용
HR 기술
지원자 추적 시스템
ATS
후보자 관리
CRM
인적 자원
인재 확보
TopDev Use cases
AI 채용
채용
HR 기술
후보자 소싱
개발자 채용
GitHub 분석
인재 소싱
기술 심사
Lever vs TopDev：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Lever vs TopDev comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Lever is primarily listed under “인재 관리”, while TopDev is primarily listed under “코드 분석”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Lever: 인재 관리; TopDev: 코드 분석); Pricing (Lever: Paid; TopDev: Freemium); Monthly visits (Lever: 11.8M; TopDev: 3.5K); Favorites (Lever: 107; TopDev: 98); Website (Lever: www.lever.co; TopDev: www.topdev.online). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Lever and TopDev currently overlap in shared categories: 채용; shared tags: AI 채용, 채용 및 HR 기술. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Lever's unique categories/tags are 인재 관리, 워크플로우 자동화, 지원자 추적 시스템, ATS, 후보자 관리, CRM, 인적 자원 및 채용; TopDev's are 코드 분석, 인재 소싱, 후보자 소싱, 개발자 채용, GitHub 분석 및 기술 심사. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Lever has no verified rating, 0 comments, 107 favorites, and 97 likes；TopDev has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 106 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Lever first
Put Lever on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “인재 관리” and especially 인재 관리, 워크플로우 자동화, 지원자 추적 시스템, ATS, 후보자 관리 및 CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Lever also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 11.8M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate TopDev first
Put TopDev on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “코드 분석” and especially 코드 분석, 인재 소싱, 후보자 소싱, 개발자 채용, GitHub 분석 및 기술 심사. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
TopDev also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.5K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Lever and TopDev, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
비교 FAQ
How should I choose between Lever and TopDev?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.