ToolMage
로그인
Make
CRM · 6.7M 월 방문

Make는 코딩 없이 간단한 작업부터 복잡한 워크플로우까지 모든 것을 설계, 구축 및 자동화할 수 있는 강력한 시각적 플랫폼입니다. OpenAI 및 Google Gemini와 같은 고급 AI 도구를 포함하여 수천 개의 앱과 서비스를 연결하여 비즈니스 운영, 마케팅, 영업 등을 간소화하는 지능형 자동화 및 AI 에이전트를 만들 수 있습니다.

VS
Nylas
CRM · 189.8K 월 방문

Nylas는 개발자를 위한 범용 API 플랫폼으로, 이메일, 캘린더, 연락처 기능을 모든 애플리케이션에 원활하게 통합할 수 있게 해줍니다. 단일 API로 Gmail, Microsoft 365 등 수백 개의 제공업체에 연결하여 개발 시간을 크게 단축합니다. 또한 Nylas는 AI 기반 Notetaker API를 제공하여 온라인 회의를 녹취함으로써 개발자가 고급 커뮤니케이션 기능을 빠르고 안전하게 구축할 수 있도록 지원합니다.

Make vs Nylas: 가격, 기능 및 트래픽 비교

제품 정보, 분류, 트래픽 및 사용자 반응을 바탕으로 Make와 Nylas를 비교합니다.

업데이트 2026. 8. 5.

제품 개요

Make 제품 개요

Make는 코딩 없이 간단한 작업부터 복잡한 워크플로우까지 모든 것을 설계, 구축 및 자동화할 수 있는 강력한 시각적 플랫폼입니다. OpenAI 및 Google Gemini와 같은 고급 AI 도구를 포함하여 수천 개의 앱과 서비스를 연결하여 비즈니스 운영, 마케팅, 영업 등을 간소화하는 지능형 자동화 및 AI 에이전트를 만들 수 있습니다.

Preview

Nylas 제품 개요

Nylas는 개발자를 위한 범용 API 플랫폼으로, 이메일, 캘린더, 연락처 기능을 모든 애플리케이션에 원활하게 통합할 수 있게 해줍니다. 단일 API로 Gmail, Microsoft 365 등 수백 개의 제공업체에 연결하여 개발 시간을 크게 단축합니다. 또한 Nylas는 AI 기반 Notetaker API를 제공하여 온라인 회의를 녹취함으로써 개발자가 고급 커뮤니케이션 기능을 빠르고 안전하게 구축할 수 있도록 지원합니다.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureMakeNylas
주요 카테고리CRMCRM
등록일2025-08-082025-08-02
가격프리미엄프리미엄
공식 사이트www.make.comwww.nylas.com
제품 유형웹사이트웹사이트
Performance data
사용자 평점확인되지 않음확인되지 않음
댓글00
월 방문6.7M189.8K
월 성장률12.7%-13.2%
즐겨찾기122124
Details상세 보기상세 보기

Make vs Nylas monthly traffic

Compare Make and Nylas by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Make vs Nylas monthly traffic comparison, Make currently shows 6.7M visits and Nylas shows 189.8K; Make has about 35.2 times the visible traffic of Nylas, an absolute difference of about 6.5M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Make monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

월 방문
6.7M
평균 방문 시간
7:28
방문당 페이지
8.43
이탈률
32.56%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/1: 5.4M 월 방문
  • 2026/2: 5M 월 방문
  • 2026/3: 6.1M 월 방문
  • 2026/4: 5.9M 월 방문
  • 2026/5: 6.7M 월 방문

주요 지역

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States40.62%2.7M
🇮🇳India19.69%1.3M
🇫🇷France18.85%1.3M
🇩🇪Germany11.09%741.7K
🇮🇱Israel9.75%652.1K

트래픽 소스

Source typePercentageTraffic
직접90.82%6.1M
리퍼럴6.17%412.7K
이메일3.01%201.3K

검색 키워드

gemini aimakemake aimake.comn8n

Nylas monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

월 방문
189.8K
평균 방문 시간
1:14
방문당 페이지
2.7
이탈률
50.8%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 201.4K 월 방문
  • 2026/1: 235.4K 월 방문
  • 2026/2: 177.1K 월 방문
  • 2026/3: 187.3K 월 방문
  • 2026/4: 218.7K 월 방문
  • 2026/5: 189.8K 월 방문

주요 지역

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States67.93%128.9K
🇮🇳India13.81%26.2K
🇳🇱Netherlands6.74%12.8K
🇧🇷Brazil5.81%11K
🇬🇧United Kingdom5.71%10.8K

트래픽 소스

Source typePercentageTraffic
직접60.57%115K
리퍼럴31.17%59.2K
이메일8.26%15.7K

검색 키워드

<email>emailjsnylasnylas apiresend api
Traffic-based selection guidance: Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Make and Nylas

Make Core features

CRM
노코드
마케팅 자동화
자동화

Nylas Core features

CRM
API 및 SDK
통신
일정 관리

Use cases

Make Use cases

API
자동화
통합
생산성
AI 에이전트
챗봇
데이터 동기화
iPaaS
마케팅 자동화
노코드
워크플로우

Nylas Use cases

API
자동화
통합
생산성
AI 회의록 전사
달력 API
연락처 API
CRM
개발자 도구
이메일 API
스케줄링

Make vs Nylas:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Make vs Nylas comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Make is primarily listed under “CRM”, while Nylas is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (Make: 6.7M; Nylas: 189.8K); Monthly growth (Make: 12.7%; Nylas: -13.2%); Favorites (Make: 122; Nylas: 124); Website (Make: www.make.com; Nylas: www.nylas.com); Added (Make: 2025-08-08; Nylas: 2025-08-02). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Make vs Nylas monthly traffic comparison, Make currently shows 6.7M visits and Nylas shows 189.8K; Make has about 35.2 times the visible traffic of Nylas, an absolute difference of about 6.5M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Make and Nylas currently overlap in shared categories: CRM; shared tags: API, 자동화, 통합 및 생산성. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Make's unique categories/tags are 노코드, 마케팅 자동화, 자동화, AI 에이전트, 챗봇, 데이터 동기화, iPaaS 및 워크플로우; Nylas's are API 및 SDK, 통신, 일정 관리, AI 회의록 전사, 달력 API, 연락처 API, CRM 및 개발자 도구. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Make has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 125 likes;Nylas has no verified rating, 0 comments, 124 favorites, and 117 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Make first

Put Make on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially 노코드, 마케팅 자동화, 자동화, AI 에이전트, 챗봇 및 데이터 동기화. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Make also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 6.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Nylas first

Put Nylas on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially API 및 SDK, 통신, 일정 관리, AI 회의록 전사, 달력 API 및 연락처 API. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Nylas also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 189.8K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Make and Nylas, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

비교 FAQ

How should I choose between Make and Nylas?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.