ToolMage
Entrar
Feedbase
Análise · 3.4K visitas mensais

O Feedbase é uma plataforma de feedback de clientes alimentada por IA que ajuda as empresas a ouvir, aprender e crescer. Ao integrar um widget simples e minimalista no seu site, pode recolher feedback dos utilizadores sem esforço e usar um painel de controlo alimentado por IA para obter insights e análises acionáveis.

VS
UserTesting
Análise · 3.4M visitas mensais

O UserTesting é uma plataforma líder de insights humanos que permite às organizações ver, ouvir e entender as experiências reais dos clientes. Ao aproveitar uma rede global de participantes e análises alimentadas por IA, ajuda equipes de produto, marketing e design a coletar feedback em vídeo para validar decisões, otimizar experiências e construir produtos centrados no cliente com confiança.

Feedbase vs UserTesting: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare Feedbase e UserTesting por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

Feedbase Visão geral

O Feedbase é uma plataforma de feedback de clientes alimentada por IA que ajuda as empresas a ouvir, aprender e crescer. Ao integrar um widget simples e minimalista no seu site, pode recolher feedback dos utilizadores sem esforço e usar um painel de controlo alimentado por IA para obter insights e análises acionáveis.

Preview

UserTesting Visão geral

O UserTesting é uma plataforma líder de insights humanos que permite às organizações ver, ouvir e entender as experiências reais dos clientes. Ao aproveitar uma rede global de participantes e análises alimentadas por IA, ajuda equipes de produto, marketing e design a coletar feedback em vídeo para validar decisões, otimizar experiências e construir produtos centrados no cliente com confiança.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureFeedbaseUserTesting
Categoria principalAnáliseAnálise
Adicionado2025-08-022025-08-10
PreçoFreemiumPago
Site oficialwww.feedbase.cowww.usertesting.com
Tipo de produtoSiteSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais3.4K3.4M
Crescimento mensalNão verificado3.4%
Favoritos104104
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

Feedbase vs UserTesting monthly traffic

Compare Feedbase and UserTesting by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Feedbase vs UserTesting monthly traffic comparison, Feedbase currently shows 3.4K visits and UserTesting shows 3.4M; UserTesting has about 1,021.7 times the visible traffic of Feedbase, an absolute difference of about 3.4M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only UserTesting has complete third-party traffic details; Feedbase uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Feedbase monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
3.4K

UserTesting monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
3.4M
Duração média
11:19
Páginas por visita
5.76
Taxa de rejeição
33%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 3M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 3.1M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 3M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 3.5M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 3.3M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 3.4M Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States50.56%1.7M
🇬🇧United Kingdom18.15%622.1K
🇨🇦Canada15.06%516.2K
🇮🇳India8.54%292.7K
🇫🇷France7.69%263.6K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto80.88%2.8M
Referência12.56%430.5K
E-mail6.56%224.9K

Palavras-chave

intellizoomuser testuser testingusertestingusertesting login
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Feedbase and UserTesting

Feedbase Core features

Análise
Pesquisa de Usuário
Coleta de Feedback
Construtores de Sites

UserTesting Core features

Análise
Pesquisa de Usuário
Feedback do Cliente

Use cases

Feedbase Use cases

Feedback do cliente
gestão de produto
Análise de IA
Inteligência de Negócios
widget de feedback
SaaS
análise de sentimento
Feedback do usuário
Pesquisa de usuário
ferramenta de site

UserTesting Use cases

Feedback do cliente
gestão de produto
Experiência do Cliente
Análise de feedback
Insight Humano
pesquisa de mercado
Teste de usabilidade
experiência do usuário
Teste de usuário
Pesquisa de UX

Feedbase vs UserTesting:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Feedbase vs UserTesting comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Feedbase is primarily listed under “Análise”, while UserTesting is primarily listed under “Análise”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Feedbase: Freemium; UserTesting: Paid); Monthly visits (Feedbase: 3.4K; UserTesting: 3.4M); Website (Feedbase: www.feedbase.co; UserTesting: www.usertesting.com); Added (Feedbase: 2025-08-02; UserTesting: 2025-08-10). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Feedbase vs UserTesting monthly traffic comparison, Feedbase currently shows 3.4K visits and UserTesting shows 3.4M; UserTesting has about 1,021.7 times the visible traffic of Feedbase, an absolute difference of about 3.4M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only UserTesting has complete third-party traffic details; Feedbase uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Feedbase and UserTesting currently overlap in shared categories: Análise e Pesquisa de Usuário; shared tags: Feedback do cliente e gestão de produto. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Feedbase's unique categories/tags are Coleta de Feedback, Construtores de Sites, Análise de IA, Inteligência de Negócios, widget de feedback, SaaS, análise de sentimento e Feedback do usuário; UserTesting's are Feedback do Cliente, Experiência do Cliente, Análise de feedback, Insight Humano, pesquisa de mercado, Teste de usabilidade, experiência do usuário e Teste de usuário. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Feedbase has no verified rating, 0 comments, 104 favorites, and 115 likes;UserTesting has no verified rating, 0 comments, 104 favorites, and 103 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Feedbase first

Put Feedbase on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Análise” and especially Coleta de Feedback, Construtores de Sites, Análise de IA, Inteligência de Negócios, widget de feedback e SaaS. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Feedbase also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate UserTesting first

Put UserTesting on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Análise” and especially Feedback do Cliente, Experiência do Cliente, Análise de feedback, Insight Humano, pesquisa de mercado e Teste de usabilidade. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

UserTesting also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 3.4M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Feedbase and UserTesting, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between Feedbase and UserTesting?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.