ToolMage
Entrar
Gem
CRM · 1.3M visitas mensais

O Gem é uma plataforma de recrutamento tudo-em-um, com IA em primeiro lugar, que combina ATS, CRM, sourcing, agendamento e análise. Foi projetado para ajudar as equipes de aquisição de talentos a economizar tempo, reduzir custos e contratar os melhores talentos mais rapidamente, unificando todo o fluxo de trabalho de recrutamento em um único sistema inteligente.

VS
Humanly
CRM · 139K visitas mensais

Humanly é uma plataforma de recrutamento baseada em IA, projetada para automatizar e escalar a contratação em alto volume. Combina um CRM e IA Agêntica para gerenciar toda a jornada do candidato, desde a prospecção e triagem até o agendamento e entrevistas. A plataforma engaja 100% dos candidatos, ajudando as equipes a contratar até 8x mais rápido sem aumentar o pessoal, enquanto melhora a experiência do candidato e promove práticas de contratação justas.

Gem vs Humanly: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare Gem e Humanly por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

Gem Visão geral

O Gem é uma plataforma de recrutamento tudo-em-um, com IA em primeiro lugar, que combina ATS, CRM, sourcing, agendamento e análise. Foi projetado para ajudar as equipes de aquisição de talentos a economizar tempo, reduzir custos e contratar os melhores talentos mais rapidamente, unificando todo o fluxo de trabalho de recrutamento em um único sistema inteligente.

Preview

Humanly Visão geral

Humanly é uma plataforma de recrutamento baseada em IA, projetada para automatizar e escalar a contratação em alto volume. Combina um CRM e IA Agêntica para gerenciar toda a jornada do candidato, desde a prospecção e triagem até o agendamento e entrevistas. A plataforma engaja 100% dos candidatos, ajudando as equipes a contratar até 8x mais rápido sem aumentar o pessoal, enquanto melhora a experiência do candidato e promove práticas de contratação justas.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureGemHumanly
Categoria principalCRMCRM
Adicionado2025-08-102025-08-05
PreçoPagoNão verificado
Site oficialwww.gem.comwww.humanly.io
Tipo de produtoSiteSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais1.3M139K
Crescimento mensal-0.2%-8.9%
Favoritos82123
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic

Compare Gem and Humanly by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic comparison, Gem currently shows 1.3M visits and Humanly shows 139K; Gem has about 9.2 times the visible traffic of Humanly, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Gem monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
1.3M
Duração média
1:28
Páginas por visita
2.24
Taxa de rejeição
58.51%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 846.2K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 1.3M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 1.3M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 1.3M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 1.3M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 1.3M Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States77.43%986.9K
🇮🇳India9.55%121.7K
🇨🇦Canada8.52%108.6K
🇬🇧United Kingdom2.46%31.4K
🇵🇰Pakistan2.04%26K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto63.41%808.2K
Referência31.31%399K
E-mail5.28%67.3K

Palavras-chave

gemgem aigem loginjuiceboxluma ai

Humanly monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
139K
Duração média
0:57
Páginas por visita
1.33
Taxa de rejeição
58.41%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 118.3K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 146.9K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 158.7K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 152.4K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 152.6K Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 139K Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States81.3%113K
🇦🇷Argentina7.31%10.2K
🇨🇦Canada6.04%8.4K
🇮🇳India3.32%4.6K
🇻🇳Vietnam2.03%2.8K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto60.2%83.7K
Referência37.19%51.7K
E-mail2.61%3.6K

Palavras-chave

cohumanly aihumainhumanlyhumanly pricinghumans&
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Gem first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Gem and Humanly

Gem Core features

CRM
Recrutamento
Automação

Humanly Core features

CRM
Recrutamento
Automação

Use cases

Gem Use cases

automação
CRM
Contratação
recursos humanos
Recrutamento
aquisição de talentos
Recrutador de IA
Análise
ATS
Gestão de Candidatos
Sourcing

Humanly Use cases

automação
CRM
Contratação
recursos humanos
Recrutamento
aquisição de talentos
Chatbot de IA
rastreamento de candidatos
Triagem de candidatos
Agendamento

Gem vs Humanly:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Gem vs Humanly comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Gem is primarily listed under “CRM”, while Humanly is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Gem: Paid; Humanly: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Gem: 1.3M; Humanly: 139K); Monthly growth (Gem: -0.2%; Humanly: -8.9%); Favorites (Gem: 82; Humanly: 123); Website (Gem: www.gem.com; Humanly: www.humanly.io). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Gem vs Humanly monthly traffic comparison, Gem currently shows 1.3M visits and Humanly shows 139K; Gem has about 9.2 times the visible traffic of Humanly, an absolute difference of about 1.1M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Gem first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Gem and Humanly currently overlap in shared categories: CRM, Recrutamento e Automação; shared tags: automação, CRM, Contratação, recursos humanos, Recrutamento e aquisição de talentos. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Gem's unique categories/tags are Recrutador de IA, Análise, ATS, Gestão de Candidatos e Sourcing; Humanly's are Chatbot de IA, rastreamento de candidatos, Triagem de candidatos e Agendamento. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Gem has no verified rating, 0 comments, 82 favorites, and 87 likes;Humanly has no verified rating, 0 comments, 123 favorites, and 123 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Gem first

Put Gem on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Recrutador de IA, Análise, ATS, Gestão de Candidatos e Sourcing. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Gem also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.3M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Humanly first

Put Humanly on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Chatbot de IA, rastreamento de candidatos, Triagem de candidatos e Agendamento. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Humanly also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 139K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Gem and Humanly, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between Gem and Humanly?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.