ToolMage
Entrar
Lever
Gestão de Talentos · 11.8M visitas mensais

O Lever é uma plataforma de recrutamento alimentada por IA que combina um Sistema de Rastreamento de Candidatos (ATS) completo com robustas capacidades de Gestão de Relacionamento com Candidatos (CRM). Ele otimiza todo o processo de contratação, desde a prospecção e triagem até entrevistas e construção de relacionamentos, para equipes de todos os tamanhos. Seu conjunto de AI Companions ajuda a automatizar tarefas, reduzir vieses e identificar os melhores candidatos mais rapidamente.

Visitar siteVer detalhes
VS
TopDev
Análise de Código · 3.5K visitas mensais

TopDev é uma plataforma de recrutamento alimentada por IA que ajuda empresas a contratar os melhores desenvolvedores analisando seus perfis no GitHub. Avalia habilidades técnicas, confiabilidade e consistência para fornecer insights profundos, otimizando o processo de contratação e economizando tempo significativo para equipes de RH e startups.

Visitar siteVer detalhes

Lever vs TopDev: preços, recursos e tráfego

Compare Lever e TopDev por posicionamento, preço, recursos, tráfego e avaliações.

Atualizado 5 de ago. de 2026

Visão geral

Lever Visão geral

O Lever é uma plataforma de recrutamento alimentada por IA que combina um Sistema de Rastreamento de Candidatos (ATS) completo com robustas capacidades de Gestão de Relacionamento com Candidatos (CRM). Ele otimiza todo o processo de contratação, desde a prospecção e triagem até entrevistas e construção de relacionamentos, para equipes de todos os tamanhos. Seu conjunto de AI Companions ajuda a automatizar tarefas, reduzir vieses e identificar os melhores candidatos mais rapidamente.

Preview

TopDev Visão geral

TopDev é uma plataforma de recrutamento alimentada por IA que ajuda empresas a contratar os melhores desenvolvedores analisando seus perfis no GitHub. Avalia habilidades técnicas, confiabilidade e consistência para fornecer insights profundos, otimizando o processo de contratação e economizando tempo significativo para equipes de RH e startups.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureLeverTopDev
Categoria principalGestão de TalentosAnálise de Código
Adicionado2025-08-172025-08-11
PreçoPagoFreemium
Site oficialwww.lever.cowww.topdev.online
Tipo de produtoSiteSite
Performance data
AvaliaçãoNão verificadoNão verificado
Comentários00
Visitas mensais11.8M3.5K
Crescimento mensal-7.4%Não verificado
Favoritos10798
DetailsVer detalhesVer detalhes

Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic

Compare Lever and TopDev by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Lever monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
11.8M
Duração média
3:28
Páginas por visita
3.36
Taxa de rejeição
41.78%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 12.9M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/1: 13.8M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/2: 12.9M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/3: 13.5M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/4: 12.7M Visitas mensais
  • 2026/5: 11.8M Visitas mensais

Principais regiões

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States68.35%8M
🇮🇳India16.91%2M
🇨🇦Canada6.68%786.3K
🇬🇧United Kingdom5.35%629.7K
🇫🇷France2.71%319K

Fontes de tráfego

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direto58.95%6.9M
Referência36.32%4.3M
E-mail4.73%556.7K

Palavras-chave

crowdgenenebaleverlever jobspaytm

TopDev monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensais
3.5K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Lever and TopDev

Lever Core features

Recrutamento
Gestão de Talentos
Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho

TopDev Core features

Recrutamento
Análise de Código
Prospecção de Talentos

Use cases

Lever Use cases

Recrutamento de IA
Contratação
Tecnologia de RH
Sistema de Rastreamento de Candidatos
ATS
Gestão de Candidatos
CRM
recursos humanos
Recrutamento
aquisição de talentos

TopDev Use cases

Recrutamento de IA
Contratação
Tecnologia de RH
Prospecção de candidatos
Recrutamento de Desenvolvedores
Análise do GitHub
Prospecção de talentos
Triagem técnica

Lever vs TopDev：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Lever vs TopDev comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Lever is primarily listed under “Gestão de Talentos”, while TopDev is primarily listed under “Análise de Código”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Lever: Gestão de Talentos; TopDev: Análise de Código); Pricing (Lever: Paid; TopDev: Freemium); Monthly visits (Lever: 11.8M; TopDev: 3.5K); Favorites (Lever: 107; TopDev: 98); Website (Lever: www.lever.co; TopDev: www.topdev.online). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Lever vs TopDev monthly traffic comparison, Lever currently shows 11.8M visits and TopDev shows 3.5K; Lever has about 3,392 times the visible traffic of TopDev, an absolute difference of about 11.8M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Lever has complete third-party traffic details; TopDev uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Lever and TopDev currently overlap in shared categories: Recrutamento; shared tags: Recrutamento de IA, Contratação e Tecnologia de RH. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Lever's unique categories/tags are Gestão de Talentos, Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho, Sistema de Rastreamento de Candidatos, ATS, Gestão de Candidatos, CRM, recursos humanos e Recrutamento; TopDev's are Análise de Código, Prospecção de Talentos, Prospecção de candidatos, Recrutamento de Desenvolvedores, Análise do GitHub, Prospecção de talentos e Triagem técnica. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Lever has no verified rating, 0 comments, 107 favorites, and 97 likes；TopDev has no verified rating, 0 comments, 98 favorites, and 106 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Lever first

Put Lever on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gestão de Talentos” and especially Gestão de Talentos, Automação de Fluxo de Trabalho, Sistema de Rastreamento de Candidatos, ATS, Gestão de Candidatos e CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Lever also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 11.8M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate TopDev first

Put TopDev on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Análise de Código” and especially Análise de Código, Prospecção de Talentos, Prospecção de candidatos, Recrutamento de Desenvolvedores, Análise do GitHub e Prospecção de talentos. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

TopDev also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.5K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Lever and TopDev, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ da comparação

How should I choose between Lever and TopDev?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.