ToolMage
Anmelden
Activepieces
KI-Agent · 218.4K monatliche besuche

Activepieces ist eine Open-Source-, KI-gestützte Automatisierungsplattform, mit der Sie Workflows und KI-Agenten ohne Code erstellen können. Sie verbindet über 350 Anwendungen und ermöglicht eine nahtlose Automatisierung für Marketing, Vertrieb und Betrieb. Sie bietet sowohl Cloud- als auch Self-Hosting-Optionen für maximale Flexibilität und Datenkontrolle.

VS
Make
CRM · 6.7M monatliche besuche

Make ist eine leistungsstarke visuelle Plattform, mit der Sie alles entwerfen, erstellen und automatisieren können – von einfachen Aufgaben bis hin zu komplexen Workflows – ganz ohne Code. Es verbindet Tausende von Apps und Diensten, einschließlich fortschrittlicher KI-Tools wie OpenAI und Google Gemini, und ermöglicht es Ihnen, intelligente Automatisierungen und KI-Agenten zu erstellen, um Ihre Geschäftsabläufe, Marketing, Vertrieb und mehr zu optimieren.

Activepieces vs Make: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche Activepieces und Make nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

Activepieces Produktübersicht

Activepieces ist eine Open-Source-, KI-gestützte Automatisierungsplattform, mit der Sie Workflows und KI-Agenten ohne Code erstellen können. Sie verbindet über 350 Anwendungen und ermöglicht eine nahtlose Automatisierung für Marketing, Vertrieb und Betrieb. Sie bietet sowohl Cloud- als auch Self-Hosting-Optionen für maximale Flexibilität und Datenkontrolle.

Preview

Make Produktübersicht

Make ist eine leistungsstarke visuelle Plattform, mit der Sie alles entwerfen, erstellen und automatisieren können – von einfachen Aufgaben bis hin zu komplexen Workflows – ganz ohne Code. Es verbindet Tausende von Apps und Diensten, einschließlich fortschrittlicher KI-Tools wie OpenAI und Google Gemini, und ermöglicht es Ihnen, intelligente Automatisierungen und KI-Agenten zu erstellen, um Ihre Geschäftsabläufe, Marketing, Vertrieb und mehr zu optimieren.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureActivepiecesMake
HauptkategorieKI-AgentCRM
Hinzugefügt2025-08-102025-08-08
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitewww.activepieces.comwww.make.com
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche218.4K6.7M
Monatliches Wachstum-2.4%12.7%
Favoriten92122
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

Activepieces vs Make monthly traffic

Compare Activepieces and Make by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Activepieces vs Make monthly traffic comparison, Activepieces currently shows 218.4K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 30.6 times the visible traffic of Activepieces, an absolute difference of about 6.5M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Activepieces monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
218.4K
Ø Besuchsdauer
1:58
Seiten pro Besuch
3.33
Absprungrate
40.85%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 279.8K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 236K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 187.9K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 246.2K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 223.6K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 218.4K Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States56.16%122.6K
🇮🇳India19.3%42.1K
🇧🇷Brazil9.48%20.7K
🇲🇽Mexico8.42%18.4K
🇻🇳Vietnam6.64%14.5K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt83.57%182.5K
Verweis11.85%25.9K
E-Mail4.58%10K

Suchbegriffe

active piecesactivepiecesactivepieces mcpforeplay mcpzapier pricing

Make monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
6.7M
Ø Besuchsdauer
7:28
Seiten pro Besuch
8.43
Absprungrate
32.56%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/1: 5.4M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 5M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 6.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 5.9M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 6.7M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States40.62%2.7M
🇮🇳India19.69%1.3M
🇫🇷France18.85%1.3M
🇩🇪Germany11.09%741.7K
🇮🇱Israel9.75%652.1K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt90.82%6.1M
Verweis6.17%412.7K
E-Mail3.01%201.3K

Suchbegriffe

gemini aimakemake aimake.comn8n
Traffic-based selection guidance: Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Activepieces and Make

Activepieces Core features

Ohne Code
Automatisierung
KI-Agent

Make Core features

Ohne Code
Automatisierung
CRM
Marketing-Automatisierung

Use cases

Activepieces Use cases

KI-Agent
API
Automatisierung
Integration
No-Code
Workflow
Geschäftsautomatisierung
Eine Alternative schaffen
Open Source
selbst gehostet
Zapier-Alternative

Make Use cases

KI-Agent
API
Automatisierung
Integration
No-Code
Workflow
Chatbot
Datensynchronisierung
iPaaS
Marketing-Automatisierung
Produktivität

Activepieces vs Make:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Activepieces vs Make comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Activepieces is primarily listed under “KI-Agent”, while Make is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Activepieces: KI-Agent; Make: CRM); Monthly visits (Activepieces: 218.4K; Make: 6.7M); Monthly growth (Activepieces: -2.4%; Make: 12.7%); Favorites (Activepieces: 92; Make: 122); Website (Activepieces: www.activepieces.com; Make: www.make.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Activepieces vs Make monthly traffic comparison, Activepieces currently shows 218.4K visits and Make shows 6.7M; Make has about 30.6 times the visible traffic of Activepieces, an absolute difference of about 6.5M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Make is registered at the www.make.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

Make is registered under a www.make.com subpath, so its large visible total may include the host platform. The current data does not justify choosing Make for traffic alone; shortlist by unique taxonomy and use case, then validate with the same tasks.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Activepieces and Make currently overlap in shared categories: Ohne Code und Automatisierung; shared tags: KI-Agent, API, Automatisierung, Integration, No-Code und Workflow. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Activepieces's unique categories/tags are KI-Agent, Geschäftsautomatisierung, Eine Alternative schaffen, Open Source, selbst gehostet und Zapier-Alternative; Make's are CRM, Marketing-Automatisierung, Chatbot, Datensynchronisierung, iPaaS und Produktivität. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Activepieces has no verified rating, 0 comments, 92 favorites, and 92 likes;Make has no verified rating, 0 comments, 122 favorites, and 125 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Activepieces first

Put Activepieces on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “KI-Agent” and especially KI-Agent, Geschäftsautomatisierung, Eine Alternative schaffen, Open Source, selbst gehostet und Zapier-Alternative. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Activepieces also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 218.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Make first

Put Make on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially CRM, Marketing-Automatisierung, Chatbot, Datensynchronisierung, iPaaS und Produktivität. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Make also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 6.7M monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Activepieces and Make, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between Activepieces and Make?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.