ToolMage
Anmelden
tawk.to
Live-Chat · 6M monatliche besuche

tawk.to ist eine 100% kostenlose Live-Chat-, Ticketing- und Wissensdatenbank-Plattform, die jetzt mit einem KI-Agenten erweitert wurde. Sie ermöglicht es Unternehmen, Website-Besucher in Echtzeit zu überwachen, mit Kunden zu interagieren und die gesamte Kommunikation über ein einziges Dashboard zu verwalten. Von über 5 Millionen Unternehmen genutzt, bietet es eine robuste Suite von Funktionen zur Verbesserung des Kundensupports und der Kundenbindung, ohne Kosten für die Kernsoftware.

Website besuchenDetails ansehen
VS
Userlike
Live-Chat · 11.1K monatliche besuche

Userlike ist eine All-in-One, KI-gestützte Kundenkommunikationsplattform für Websites und Messaging-Apps. Sie kombiniert Live-Chat, einen GPT-4-Chatbot und Integrationen mit Kanälen wie WhatsApp, um Unternehmen bei der Lead-Generierung, der Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit und der Steigerung der Service-Effizienz zu unterstützen. In Deutschland entwickelt und gehostet, legt Userlike großen Wert auf Datenschutz und DSGVO-Konformität.

Website besuchenDetails ansehen

tawk.to vs Userlike: Preise, Funktionen und Traffic

Vergleiche tawk.to und Userlike nach Positionierung, Preis, Funktionen, Traffic und Nutzerfeedback.

Aktualisiert 05.08.2026

Produktübersicht

tawk.to Produktübersicht

tawk.to ist eine 100% kostenlose Live-Chat-, Ticketing- und Wissensdatenbank-Plattform, die jetzt mit einem KI-Agenten erweitert wurde. Sie ermöglicht es Unternehmen, Website-Besucher in Echtzeit zu überwachen, mit Kunden zu interagieren und die gesamte Kommunikation über ein einziges Dashboard zu verwalten. Von über 5 Millionen Unternehmen genutzt, bietet es eine robuste Suite von Funktionen zur Verbesserung des Kundensupports und der Kundenbindung, ohne Kosten für die Kernsoftware.

Preview

Userlike Produktübersicht

Userlike ist eine All-in-One, KI-gestützte Kundenkommunikationsplattform für Websites und Messaging-Apps. Sie kombiniert Live-Chat, einen GPT-4-Chatbot und Integrationen mit Kanälen wie WhatsApp, um Unternehmen bei der Lead-Generierung, der Verbesserung der Kundenzufriedenheit und der Steigerung der Service-Effizienz zu unterstützen. In Deutschland entwickelt und gehostet, legt Userlike großen Wert auf Datenschutz und DSGVO-Konformität.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

Featuretawk.toUserlike
HauptkategorieLive-ChatLive-Chat
Hinzugefügt2025-08-142025-08-11
PreismodellFreemiumFreemium
Offizielle Websitewww.tawk.towww.userlike.com
ProdukttypWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
NutzerbewertungNicht verifiziertNicht verifiziert
Kommentare00
Monatliche Besuche6M11.1K
Monatliches Wachstum-1%7.2%
Favoriten93145
DetailsDetails ansehenDetails ansehen

tawk.to vs Userlike monthly traffic

Compare tawk.to and Userlike by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the tawk.to vs Userlike monthly traffic comparison, tawk.to currently shows 6M visits and Userlike shows 11.1K; tawk.to has about 539.3 times the visible traffic of Userlike, an absolute difference of about 6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Userlike is registered at the www.userlike.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

tawk.to monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
6M
Ø Besuchsdauer
7:52
Seiten pro Besuch
4.86
Absprungrate
44.83%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 7M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/1: 6.9M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 5.6M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 6M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 6.1M Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 6M Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States42.44%2.5M
🇧🇷Brazil19.04%1.1M
🇮🇳India16.07%965.1K
🇳🇬Nigeria12.2%732.7K
🇮🇩Indonesia10.25%615.6K

Traffic-Quellen

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direkt77.14%4.6M
Verweis19.79%1.2M
E-Mail3.07%184.4K

Suchbegriffe

tawktawk totawk.totawktotwak

Userlike monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monatliche Besuche
11.1K
Ø Besuchsdauer
0:11
Seiten pro Besuch
1.84
Absprungrate
37.38%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2026/1: 15.2K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/2: 9.4K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/3: 13.3K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/4: 10.4K Monatliche Besuche
  • 2026/5: 11.1K Monatliche Besuche

Top-Regionen

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇩🇪Germany32.86%3.7K
🇫🇷France19.61%2.2K
🇺🇸United States16.28%1.8K
🇮🇩Indonesia15.72%1.8K
🇮🇳India15.53%1.7K

Suchbegriffe

360dialoguserlikewhatsapp business link placeholderswhat's the actual size of a whatsapp profile picturewhat's the actual size of whatsapp dp
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate tawk.to first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of tawk.to and Userlike

tawk.to Core features

Live-Chat
Lead-Generierung
Automatisierung

Userlike Core features

Live-Chat
Lead-Generierung
Automatisierung

Use cases

tawk.to Use cases

Chatbot
Kundenengagement
Kundensupport
Lead-Generierung
Live-Chat
KI-Agent
CRM
Kostenloser Live-Chat
Wissensdatenbank
Ticketsystem
Website-Widget

Userlike Use cases

Chatbot
Kundenengagement
Kundensupport
Lead-Generierung
Live-Chat
KI-Assistent
Automatisierung
GDPR
GPT-4
WhatsApp

tawk.to vs Userlike：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth tawk.to vs Userlike comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. tawk.to is primarily listed under “Live-Chat”, while Userlike is primarily listed under “Live-Chat”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (tawk.to: 6M; Userlike: 11.1K); Monthly growth (tawk.to: -1%; Userlike: 7.2%); Favorites (tawk.to: 93; Userlike: 145); Website (tawk.to: www.tawk.to; Userlike: www.userlike.com); Added (tawk.to: 2025-08-14; Userlike: 2025-08-11). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the tawk.to vs Userlike monthly traffic comparison, tawk.to currently shows 6M visits and Userlike shows 11.1K; tawk.to has about 539.3 times the visible traffic of Userlike, an absolute difference of about 6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

Userlike is registered at the www.userlike.com/en subpage. Because the current data does not state whether other host pages are excluded, treat this as domain-level context rather than independent traffic for one product or project.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate tawk.to first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

tawk.to and Userlike currently overlap in shared categories: Live-Chat, Lead-Generierung und Automatisierung; shared tags: Chatbot, Kundenengagement, Kundensupport, Lead-Generierung und Live-Chat. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

tawk.to's unique categories/tags are KI-Agent, CRM, Kostenloser Live-Chat, Wissensdatenbank, Ticketsystem und Website-Widget; Userlike's are KI-Assistent, Automatisierung, GDPR, GPT-4 und WhatsApp. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

tawk.to has no verified rating, 0 comments, 93 favorites, and 87 likes；Userlike has no verified rating, 0 comments, 145 favorites, and 133 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate tawk.to first

Put tawk.to on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Live-Chat” and especially KI-Agent, CRM, Kostenloser Live-Chat, Wissensdatenbank, Ticketsystem und Website-Widget. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

tawk.to also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 6M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Userlike first

Put Userlike on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Live-Chat” and especially KI-Assistent, Automatisierung, GDPR, GPT-4 und WhatsApp. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Userlike also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 11.1K monthly visits shown for the registered host (subpage scope unknown), no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in tawk.to and Userlike, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Vergleichs-FAQ

How should I choose between tawk.to and Userlike?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.