ToolMage
Iniciar sesión
Clinicminds
CRM · 203.2K visitas mensuales

Clinicminds es un software de gestión de consultas todo en uno diseñado para clínicas de estética. Optimiza las operaciones con funciones como expedientes médicos electrónicos (EMR), programación de citas en línea, formularios de consentimiento digital, facturación y potentes análisis, ayudando a las clínicas a eliminar el papel y hacer crecer su negocio de manera eficiente.

VS
ProgressMagic
CRM · 3.3K visitas mensuales

ProgressMagic es una plataforma de gestión de consultas impulsada por IA, diseñada para terapeutas, coaches y profesionales de la salud. Simplifica tareas administrativas como la programación y la facturación, al tiempo que ofrece herramientas avanzadas para seguir el progreso del cliente. Aprovecha la IA para generar notas perspicaces, analizar datos de sesiones y ofrecer una atención más eficaz y personalizada desde un único panel intuitivo.

Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic: precios, funciones y tráfico

Compara Clinicminds y ProgressMagic por posicionamiento, precio, capacidades, tráfico y opiniones.

Actualizado 5 ago 2026

Resumen del producto

Clinicminds Resumen del producto

Clinicminds es un software de gestión de consultas todo en uno diseñado para clínicas de estética. Optimiza las operaciones con funciones como expedientes médicos electrónicos (EMR), programación de citas en línea, formularios de consentimiento digital, facturación y potentes análisis, ayudando a las clínicas a eliminar el papel y hacer crecer su negocio de manera eficiente.

Preview

ProgressMagic Resumen del producto

ProgressMagic es una plataforma de gestión de consultas impulsada por IA, diseñada para terapeutas, coaches y profesionales de la salud. Simplifica tareas administrativas como la programación y la facturación, al tiempo que ofrece herramientas avanzadas para seguir el progreso del cliente. Aprovecha la IA para generar notas perspicaces, analizar datos de sesiones y ofrecer una atención más eficaz y personalizada desde un único panel intuitivo.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureClinicmindsProgressMagic
Categoría principalCRMCRM
Añadido2025-08-032025-08-15
PrecioDe pagoSin verificar
Sitio oficialwww.clinicminds.comwww.progressmagic.com
Tipo de productoSitio webSitio web
Performance data
ValoraciónSin verificarSin verificar
Comentarios00
Visitas mensuales203.2K3.3K
Crecimiento mensual9.6%Sin verificar
Favoritos124145
DetailsVer detallesVer detalles

Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic

Compare Clinicminds and ProgressMagic by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic comparison, Clinicminds currently shows 203.2K visits and ProgressMagic shows 3.3K; Clinicminds has about 60.7 times the visible traffic of ProgressMagic, an absolute difference of about 199.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Clinicminds has complete third-party traffic details; ProgressMagic uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Clinicminds monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
203.2K
Duración media
6:38
Páginas por visita
3.06
Tasa de rebote
39.46%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 109.4K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/1: 122.4K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/2: 101.1K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/3: 155K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/4: 185.3K Visitas mensuales
  • 2026/5: 203.2K Visitas mensuales

Regiones principales

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇳🇱Netherlands95.86%194.8K
🇺🇸United States1.75%3.6K
🇬🇧United Kingdom1.41%2.9K
🇮🇳India0.62%1.3K
🇨🇦Canada0.36%732

Fuentes de tráfico

Source typePercentageTraffic
Directo54.2%110.1K
Correo electrónico32.75%66.5K
Referido13.05%26.5K

Palabras clave

clinic mindsclinicmindsclinicminds api docsinloggen clinic minds dr finntreatwell

ProgressMagic monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visitas mensuales
3.3K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Clinicminds and ProgressMagic

Clinicminds Core features

CRM
Programación
Facturación
Gestión de Consultorios

ProgressMagic Core features

CRM
Programación
Asistencia Clínica
Gestión de Prácticas

Use cases

Clinicminds Use cases

Gestión de la práctica
clínica estética
Programación de Citas
Análisis Clínico
CRM
Consentimiento digital
Registro Electrónico de Salud
EMR
Facturación
software médico
Gestión de pacientes

ProgressMagic Use cases

Gestión de la práctica
Notas de IA
gestión de clientes
Software de coaching
Compatible con HIPAA
Facturación médica
Seguimiento del progreso
Programación
Telesalud
Herramientas para terapeutas

Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic:In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Clinicminds is primarily listed under “CRM”, while ProgressMagic is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Clinicminds: Paid; ProgressMagic: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Clinicminds: 203.2K; ProgressMagic: 3.3K); Favorites (Clinicminds: 124; ProgressMagic: 145); Website (Clinicminds: www.clinicminds.com; ProgressMagic: www.progressmagic.com); Added (Clinicminds: 2025-08-03; ProgressMagic: 2025-08-15). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic comparison, Clinicminds currently shows 203.2K visits and ProgressMagic shows 3.3K; Clinicminds has about 60.7 times the visible traffic of ProgressMagic, an absolute difference of about 199.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Clinicminds has complete third-party traffic details; ProgressMagic uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Clinicminds and ProgressMagic currently overlap in shared categories: CRM y Programación; shared tags: Gestión de la práctica. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Clinicminds's unique categories/tags are Facturación, Gestión de Consultorios, clínica estética, Programación de Citas, Análisis Clínico, CRM, Consentimiento digital y Registro Electrónico de Salud; ProgressMagic's are Asistencia Clínica, Gestión de Prácticas, Notas de IA, gestión de clientes, Software de coaching, Compatible con HIPAA, Facturación médica y Seguimiento del progreso. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Clinicminds has no verified rating, 0 comments, 124 favorites, and 121 likes;ProgressMagic has no verified rating, 0 comments, 145 favorites, and 140 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Clinicminds first

Put Clinicminds on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Facturación, Gestión de Consultorios, clínica estética, Programación de Citas, Análisis Clínico y CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Clinicminds also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 203.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate ProgressMagic first

Put ProgressMagic on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially Asistencia Clínica, Gestión de Prácticas, Notas de IA, gestión de clientes, Software de coaching y Compatible con HIPAA. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

ProgressMagic also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Clinicminds and ProgressMagic, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Preguntas frecuentes

How should I choose between Clinicminds and ProgressMagic?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.