Ashby
分析 · 17.6M 月間訪問数
Ashbyは、AIを活用して意欲的なチームの採用を効率化するオールインワンの採用プラットフォームです。応募者追跡システム（ATS）、CRM、スケジューリング、高度な分析を単一の統合システムにまとめています。スタートアップから大企業まで、あらゆる規模の企業向けに設計されており、退屈なタスクを自動化し、深い洞察を提供し、採用プロセス全体を強化します。
製品概要
Ashby 製品概要
Ashbyは、AIを活用して意欲的なチームの採用を効率化するオールインワンの採用プラットフォームです。応募者追跡システム（ATS）、CRM、スケジューリング、高度な分析を単一の統合システムにまとめています。スタートアップから大企業まで、あらゆる規模の企業向けに設計されており、退屈なタスクを自動化し、深い洞察を提供し、採用プロセス全体を強化します。
Preview
Marketch 製品概要
Marketchは、企業が多様なテクノロジーチームを構築するのを支援するために設計されたAI搭載プラットフォームです。インテリジェントなアルゴリズムを活用し、採用担当者が偏見なく候補者をソーシング、スクリーニング、マッチングするのを助け、最初から最後まで公正で包括的な採用プロセスを保証します。
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Ashby | Marketch |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | 分析 | 分析 |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-04 | 2025-08-14 |
| 価格 | 有料 | 未確認 |
| 公式サイト | www.ashbyhq.com | www.getmarketch.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 17.6M | 3.3K |
| 月間成長率 | -0.7% | 未確認 |
| お気に入り | 99 | 116 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Ashby vs Marketch monthly traffic
Compare Ashby and Marketch by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Ashby vs Marketch monthly traffic comparison, Ashby currently shows 17.6M visits and Marketch shows 3.3K; Ashby has about 5,270 times the visible traffic of Marketch, an absolute difference of about 17.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Ashby has complete third-party traffic details; Marketch uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Ashby monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
17.6M
平均滞在時間
3:50
訪問あたりページ数
3.84
直帰率
40.96%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 12.6M 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 16.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 15.9M 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 18.1M 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 17.7M 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 17.6M 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 70.65% | 12.4M |
| 🇮🇳India | 10.29% | 1.8M |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 9.05% | 1.6M |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 6.74% | 1.2M |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 3.27% | 576.1K |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 66.63% | 11.7M |
| 参照元 | 28.97% | 5.1M |
| Eメール | 4.4% | 775.2K |
検索キーワード
ashbyashbyhqharvey careersmodal careerspolymarket careers
Marketch monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
月間訪問数
3.3K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Ashby and Marketch
Ashby Core features
分析
採用
自動化
Marketch Core features
分析
採用
自動化
Use cases
Ashby Use cases
アナリティクス
採用
人材獲得
AI採用
採用管理システム
ATS
CRM
人事
スケジュール自動化
Marketch Use cases
アナリティクス
採用
人材獲得
AIリクルーター
バイアス検出
候補者ソーシング
多様性
HRテック
インクルージョン
Ashby vs Marketch：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Ashby vs Marketch comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Ashby is primarily listed under “分析”, while Marketch is primarily listed under “分析”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Ashby: Paid; Marketch: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Ashby: 17.6M; Marketch: 3.3K); Favorites (Ashby: 99; Marketch: 116); Website (Ashby: www.ashbyhq.com; Marketch: www.getmarketch.com); Added (Ashby: 2025-08-04; Marketch: 2025-08-14). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Ashby vs Marketch monthly traffic comparison, Ashby currently shows 17.6M visits and Marketch shows 3.3K; Ashby has about 5,270 times the visible traffic of Marketch, an absolute difference of about 17.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Ashby has complete third-party traffic details; Marketch uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Ashby and Marketch currently overlap in shared categories: 分析、採用、自動化; shared tags: アナリティクス、採用、人材獲得. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Ashby's unique categories/tags are AI採用、採用管理システム、ATS、CRM、人事、スケジュール自動化; Marketch's are AIリクルーター、バイアス検出、候補者ソーシング、多様性、HRテック、インクルージョン. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Ashby has no verified rating, 0 comments, 99 favorites, and 103 likes；Marketch has no verified rating, 0 comments, 116 favorites, and 125 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Ashby first
Put Ashby on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “分析” and especially AI採用、採用管理システム、ATS、CRM、人事、スケジュール自動化. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Ashby also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 17.6M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Marketch first
Put Marketch on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “分析” and especially AIリクルーター、バイアス検出、候補者ソーシング、多様性、HRテック、インクルージョン. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Marketch also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Ashby and Marketch, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
比較 FAQ
How should I choose between Ashby and Marketch?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.