Clinicmindsは、美容クリニック向けに設計されたオールインワンの診療管理ソフトウェアです。電子カルテ(EMR)、オンライン予約、デジタル同意書、請求書発行、強力な分析などの機能で業務を効率化し、クリニックのペーパーレス化と効率的な事業成長を支援します。
ProgressMagicは、セラピスト、コーチ、医療専門家向けに設計されたAI搭載の実践管理プラットフォームです。スケジューリングや請求などの管理業務を効率化し、クライアントの進捗を追跡するための高度なツールを提供します。AIを活用して洞察に満ちたメモを生成し、セッションデータを分析し、直感的なダッシュボードからより効果的で個別化されたケアを提供します。
製品概要
Clinicminds 製品概要
Clinicmindsは、美容クリニック向けに設計されたオールインワンの診療管理ソフトウェアです。電子カルテ(EMR)、オンライン予約、デジタル同意書、請求書発行、強力な分析などの機能で業務を効率化し、クリニックのペーパーレス化と効率的な事業成長を支援します。
ProgressMagic 製品概要
ProgressMagicは、セラピスト、コーチ、医療専門家向けに設計されたAI搭載の実践管理プラットフォームです。スケジューリングや請求などの管理業務を効率化し、クライアントの進捗を追跡するための高度なツールを提供します。AIを活用して洞察に満ちたメモを生成し、セッションデータを分析し、直感的なダッシュボードからより効果的で個別化されたケアを提供します。
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Clinicminds | ProgressMagic |
|---|---|---|
| 主要カテゴリー | CRM | CRM |
| 追加日 | 2025-08-03 | 2025-08-15 |
| 価格 | 有料 | 未確認 |
| 公式サイト | www.clinicminds.com | www.progressmagic.com |
| 製品タイプ | ウェブサイト | ウェブサイト |
| Performance data | ||
| ユーザー評価 | 未確認 | 未確認 |
| コメント | 0 | 0 |
| 月間訪問数 | 203.2K | 3.3K |
| 月間成長率 | 9.6% | 未確認 |
| お気に入り | 124 | 145 |
| Details | 詳細を見る | 詳細を見る |
Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic
Compare Clinicminds and ProgressMagic by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic comparison, Clinicminds currently shows 203.2K visits and ProgressMagic shows 3.3K; Clinicminds has about 60.7 times the visible traffic of ProgressMagic, an absolute difference of about 199.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Clinicminds has complete third-party traffic details; ProgressMagic uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Clinicminds monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 109.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/1: 122.4K 月間訪問数
- 2026/2: 101.1K 月間訪問数
- 2026/3: 155K 月間訪問数
- 2026/4: 185.3K 月間訪問数
- 2026/5: 203.2K 月間訪問数
主要地域
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱Netherlands | 95.86% | 194.8K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 1.75% | 3.6K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 1.41% | 2.9K |
| 🇮🇳India | 0.62% | 1.3K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 0.36% | 732 |
流入元
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| ダイレクト | 54.2% | 110.1K |
| Eメール | 32.75% | 66.5K |
| 参照元 | 13.05% | 26.5K |
検索キーワード
ProgressMagic monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Clinicminds and ProgressMagic
Clinicminds Core features
ProgressMagic Core features
Use cases
Clinicminds Use cases
ProgressMagic Use cases
Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Clinicminds is primarily listed under “CRM”, while ProgressMagic is primarily listed under “CRM”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Clinicminds: Paid; ProgressMagic: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Clinicminds: 203.2K; ProgressMagic: 3.3K); Favorites (Clinicminds: 124; ProgressMagic: 145); Website (Clinicminds: www.clinicminds.com; ProgressMagic: www.progressmagic.com); Added (Clinicminds: 2025-08-03; ProgressMagic: 2025-08-15). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Clinicminds vs ProgressMagic monthly traffic comparison, Clinicminds currently shows 203.2K visits and ProgressMagic shows 3.3K; Clinicminds has about 60.7 times the visible traffic of ProgressMagic, an absolute difference of about 199.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Clinicminds has complete third-party traffic details; ProgressMagic uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Clinicminds and ProgressMagic currently overlap in shared categories: CRM、スケジュール; shared tags: 業務管理. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Clinicminds's unique categories/tags are 請求書発行、業務管理、美容クリニック、予約管理、クリニック分析、CRM、デジタル同意、電子健康記録; ProgressMagic's are 臨床支援、業務管理、AIノート、顧客管理、コーチングソフトウェア、HIPAA準拠、医療費請求、進捗状況の追跡. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Clinicminds has no verified rating, 0 comments, 124 favorites, and 121 likes;ProgressMagic has no verified rating, 0 comments, 145 favorites, and 140 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Clinicminds first
Put Clinicminds on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially 請求書発行、業務管理、美容クリニック、予約管理、クリニック分析、CRM. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Clinicminds also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 203.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate ProgressMagic first
Put ProgressMagic on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “CRM” and especially 臨床支援、業務管理、AIノート、顧客管理、コーチングソフトウェア、HIPAA準拠. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
ProgressMagic also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Clinicminds and ProgressMagic, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




