Ashby
분석 · 17.6M 월 방문
Ashby는 AI를 활용하여 야심 찬 팀의 채용을 간소화하는 올인원 채용 플랫폼입니다. 지원자 추적 시스템(ATS), CRM, 스케줄링 및 고급 분석을 단일 통합 시스템으로 결합합니다. 스타트업부터 대기업까지 모든 규모의 회사를 위해 설계된 Ashby는 지루한 작업을 자동화하고 심층적인 통찰력을 제공하며 전체 채용 프로세스를 향상시킵니다.
제품 개요
Ashby 제품 개요
Ashby는 AI를 활용하여 야심 찬 팀의 채용을 간소화하는 올인원 채용 플랫폼입니다. 지원자 추적 시스템(ATS), CRM, 스케줄링 및 고급 분석을 단일 통합 시스템으로 결합합니다. 스타트업부터 대기업까지 모든 규모의 회사를 위해 설계된 Ashby는 지루한 작업을 자동화하고 심층적인 통찰력을 제공하며 전체 채용 프로세스를 향상시킵니다.
Preview
Marketch 제품 개요
Marketch는 기업이 다양한 기술 팀을 구성할 수 있도록 돕기 위해 설계된 AI 기반 플랫폼입니다. 지능형 알고리즘을 활용하여 채용 담당자가 편견 없이 후보자를 소싱, 스크리닝 및 매칭하도록 지원하여 처음부터 끝까지 공정하고 포용적인 채용 프로세스를 보장합니다.
Preview
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Ashby | Marketch |
|---|---|---|
| 주요 카테고리 | 분석 | 분석 |
| 등록일 | 2025-08-04 | 2025-08-14 |
| 가격 | 유료 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 공식 사이트 | www.ashbyhq.com | www.getmarketch.com |
| 제품 유형 | 웹사이트 | 웹사이트 |
| Performance data | ||
| 사용자 평점 | 확인되지 않음 | 확인되지 않음 |
| 댓글 | 0 | 0 |
| 월 방문 | 17.6M | 3.3K |
| 월 성장률 | -0.7% | 확인되지 않음 |
| 즐겨찾기 | 99 | 116 |
| Details | 상세 보기 | 상세 보기 |
Ashby vs Marketch monthly traffic
Compare Ashby and Marketch by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Ashby vs Marketch monthly traffic comparison, Ashby currently shows 17.6M visits and Marketch shows 3.3K; Ashby has about 5,270 times the visible traffic of Marketch, an absolute difference of about 17.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Ashby has complete third-party traffic details; Marketch uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
Ashby monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
17.6M
평균 방문 시간
3:50
방문당 페이지
3.84
이탈률
40.96%
Data updated 2026-06-15
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 12.6M 월 방문
- 2026/1: 16.1M 월 방문
- 2026/2: 15.9M 월 방문
- 2026/3: 18.1M 월 방문
- 2026/4: 17.7M 월 방문
- 2026/5: 17.6M 월 방문
주요 지역
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 70.65% | 12.4M |
| 🇮🇳India | 10.29% | 1.8M |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 9.05% | 1.6M |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 6.74% | 1.2M |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 3.27% | 576.1K |
트래픽 소스
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 직접 | 66.63% | 11.7M |
| 리퍼럴 | 28.97% | 5.1M |
| 이메일 | 4.4% | 775.2K |
검색 키워드
ashbyashbyhqharvey careersmodal careerspolymarket careers
Marketch monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
월 방문
3.3K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Ashby and Marketch
Ashby Core features
분석
채용
자동화
Marketch Core features
분석
채용
자동화
Use cases
Ashby Use cases
분석
채용
인재 확보
AI 채용
지원자 추적 시스템
ATS
CRM
인적 자원
스케줄링 자동화
Marketch Use cases
분석
채용
인재 확보
AI 리크루터
편향 감지
후보자 소싱
다양성
HR 기술
포용성
Ashby vs Marketch：In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Ashby vs Marketch comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Ashby is primarily listed under “분석”, while Marketch is primarily listed under “분석”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Pricing (Ashby: Paid; Marketch: Not disclosed); Monthly visits (Ashby: 17.6M; Marketch: 3.3K); Favorites (Ashby: 99; Marketch: 116); Website (Ashby: www.ashbyhq.com; Marketch: www.getmarketch.com); Added (Ashby: 2025-08-04; Marketch: 2025-08-14). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Ashby vs Marketch monthly traffic comparison, Ashby currently shows 17.6M visits and Marketch shows 3.3K; Ashby has about 5,270 times the visible traffic of Marketch, an absolute difference of about 17.6M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only Ashby has complete third-party traffic details; Marketch uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Ashby and Marketch currently overlap in shared categories: 분석, 채용 및 자동화; shared tags: 분석, 채용 및 인재 확보. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Ashby's unique categories/tags are AI 채용, 지원자 추적 시스템, ATS, CRM, 인적 자원 및 스케줄링 자동화; Marketch's are AI 리크루터, 편향 감지, 후보자 소싱, 다양성, HR 기술 및 포용성. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Ashby has no verified rating, 0 comments, 99 favorites, and 103 likes；Marketch has no verified rating, 0 comments, 116 favorites, and 125 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Ashby first
Put Ashby on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “분석” and especially AI 채용, 지원자 추적 시스템, ATS, CRM, 인적 자원 및 스케줄링 자동화. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Ashby also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 17.6M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Marketch first
Put Marketch on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “분석” and especially AI 리크루터, 편향 감지, 후보자 소싱, 다양성, HR 기술 및 포용성. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Marketch also currently records: pricing is not verified, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Ashby and Marketch, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
비교 FAQ
How should I choose between Ashby and Marketch?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.