DeepIP is a generative AI assistant for patent professionals, designed to accelerate and enhance the patent drafting and prosecution process. Integrated directly into Microsoft Word, it helps summarize inventions, draft high-quality claims and specifications, respond to office actions, and ensure document consistency, all while adhering to the highest security standards.
Solve Intelligence is an AI-powered platform designed for legal professionals to enhance productivity in the patent lifecycle. It offers tools for patent drafting, prosecution, and invention harvesting, enabling users to increase efficiency by over 50% while improving the quality of their work. The platform prioritizes security and confidentiality, making it a trusted solution for hundreds of IP teams worldwide.
DeepIP is a generative AI assistant for patent professionals, designed to accelerate and enhance the patent drafting and prosecution process. Integrated directly into Microsoft Word, it helps summarize inventions, draft high-quality claims and specifications, respond to office actions, and ensure document consistency, all while adhering to the highest security standards.
Solve Intelligence is an AI-powered platform designed for legal professionals to enhance productivity in the patent lifecycle. It offers tools for patent drafting, prosecution, and invention harvesting, enabling users to increase efficiency by over 50% while improving the quality of their work. The platform prioritizes security and confidentiality, making it a trusted solution for hundreds of IP teams worldwide.
| Feature | DeepIP | Solve Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Intellectual Property | Intellectual Property |
| Added | 2025-08-06 | 2025-08-01 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Official website | www.deepip.ai | www.solveintelligence.com |
| Product type | Website | Website |
| Performance data | ||
| User rating | Not verified | Not verified |
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Monthly visits | 35.4K | 30.1K |
| Monthly growth | 39.3% | 4% |
| Favorites | 115 | 95 |
| Details | View details | View details |
Compare DeepIP and Solve Intelligence by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the DeepIP vs Solve Intelligence monthly traffic comparison, DeepIP currently shows 35.4K visits and Solve Intelligence shows 30.1K; DeepIP has about 1.2 times the visible traffic of Solve Intelligence, an absolute difference of about 5.3K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷France | 48.56% | 17.2K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 27.87% | 9.9K |
| 🇮🇳India | 9.79% | 3.5K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 8.68% | 3.1K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 5.1% | 1.8K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 97.8% | 34.6K |
| Referral | 2.2% | 779 |
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 52.75% | 15.9K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 20.56% | 6.2K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 15.48% | 4.7K |
| 🇮🇳India | 7.87% | 2.4K |
| 🇫🇷France | 3.34% | 1K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 83.03% | 25K |
| Referral | 10.79% | 3.3K |
| 6.18% | 1.9K |
This in-depth DeepIP vs Solve Intelligence comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. DeepIP is primarily listed under “Intellectual Property”, while Solve Intelligence is primarily listed under “Intellectual Property”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Monthly visits (DeepIP: 35.4K; Solve Intelligence: 30.1K); Monthly growth (DeepIP: 39.3%; Solve Intelligence: 4%); Favorites (DeepIP: 115; Solve Intelligence: 95); Website (DeepIP: www.deepip.ai; Solve Intelligence: www.solveintelligence.com); Added (DeepIP: 2025-08-06; Solve Intelligence: 2025-08-01). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the DeepIP vs Solve Intelligence monthly traffic comparison, DeepIP currently shows 35.4K visits and Solve Intelligence shows 30.1K; DeepIP has about 1.2 times the visible traffic of Solve Intelligence, an absolute difference of about 5.3K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
DeepIP and Solve Intelligence currently overlap in shared categories: Intellectual Property and Patent; shared tags: ai for lawyers, intellectual property, legal tech, patent drafting, and patent prosecution. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
DeepIP's unique categories/tags are Writing Assistant, claim drafting, generative AI, legal assistant, Microsoft Word add-in, and office action; Solve Intelligence's are Writing, invention disclosure, legal writing, office action response, and patent copilot. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
DeepIP has no verified rating, 0 comments, 115 favorites, and 124 likes；Solve Intelligence has no verified rating, 0 comments, 95 favorites, and 101 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put DeepIP on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Intellectual Property” and especially Writing Assistant, claim drafting, generative AI, legal assistant, Microsoft Word add-in, and office action. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
DeepIP also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 35.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put Solve Intelligence on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Intellectual Property” and especially Writing, invention disclosure, legal writing, office action response, and patent copilot. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Solve Intelligence also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 30.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in DeepIP and Solve Intelligence, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
