Fluidstack is a leading AI cloud platform providing high-performance, dedicated GPU clusters for training and serving frontier AI models. It offers rapid deployment of thousands of GPUs, fully managed services with 24/7 expert support, and transparent pricing with zero egress fees, empowering AI teams to scale without infrastructure friction.
Nebius is a high-performance cloud platform specifically engineered for AI and machine learning. It provides access to the latest NVIDIA GPUs, scalable clusters with InfiniBand networking, and fully managed services like Kubernetes and Slurm, enabling seamless AI model training, fine-tuning, and inference at any scale.
Fluidstack is a leading AI cloud platform providing high-performance, dedicated GPU clusters for training and serving frontier AI models. It offers rapid deployment of thousands of GPUs, fully managed services with 24/7 expert support, and transparent pricing with zero egress fees, empowering AI teams to scale without infrastructure friction.
Nebius is a high-performance cloud platform specifically engineered for AI and machine learning. It provides access to the latest NVIDIA GPUs, scalable clusters with InfiniBand networking, and fully managed services like Kubernetes and Slurm, enabling seamless AI model training, fine-tuning, and inference at any scale.
| Feature | Fluidstack | Nebius |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Enterprise Solutions | Machine Learning |
| Added | 2025-08-09 | 2025-08-02 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Official website | www.fluidstack.io | nebius.com |
| Product type | Website | Website |
| Performance data | ||
| User rating | Not verified | Not verified |
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Monthly visits | 101.4K | 677.5K |
| Monthly growth | 0.4% | 14.8% |
| Favorites | 95 | 90 |
| Details | View details | View details |
Compare Fluidstack and Nebius by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the Fluidstack vs Nebius monthly traffic comparison, Fluidstack currently shows 101.4K visits and Nebius shows 677.5K; Nebius has about 6.7 times the visible traffic of Fluidstack, an absolute difference of about 576.1K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 87.31% | 88.5K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 6.99% | 7.1K |
| 🇮🇳India | 2.34% | 2.4K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 1.75% | 1.8K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 1.61% | 1.6K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 77.86% | 79K |
| Referral | 16.42% | 16.7K |
| 5.72% | 5.8K |
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 60.28% | 408.4K |
| 🇳🇱Netherlands | 14.35% | 97.2K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 10.4% | 70.5K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 9.39% | 63.6K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 5.58% | 37.8K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 77.96% | 528.2K |
| Referral | 18.93% | 128.3K |
| 3.11% | 21.1K |
This in-depth Fluidstack vs Nebius comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fluidstack is primarily listed under “Enterprise Solutions”, while Nebius is primarily listed under “Machine Learning”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Fluidstack: Enterprise Solutions; Nebius: Machine Learning); Monthly visits (Fluidstack: 101.4K; Nebius: 677.5K); Monthly growth (Fluidstack: 0.4%; Nebius: 14.8%); Favorites (Fluidstack: 95; Nebius: 90); Website (Fluidstack: www.fluidstack.io; Nebius: nebius.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the Fluidstack vs Nebius monthly traffic comparison, Fluidstack currently shows 101.4K visits and Nebius shows 677.5K; Nebius has about 6.7 times the visible traffic of Fluidstack, an absolute difference of about 576.1K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Nebius first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Fluidstack and Nebius currently overlap in shared categories: Cloud Computing; shared tags: AI infrastructure, cloud computing, inference, machine learning, and model training. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Fluidstack's unique categories/tags are Enterprise Solutions, Machine Learning, B200, deep learning, enterprise AI, GPU cloud, H100, and high performance computing; Nebius's are Machine Learning, Gpu, data center, GPU, HPC, kubernetes, llm, and NVIDIA. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
Fluidstack has no verified rating, 0 comments, 95 favorites, and 92 likes；Nebius has no verified rating, 0 comments, 90 favorites, and 86 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put Fluidstack on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Enterprise Solutions” and especially Enterprise Solutions, Machine Learning, B200, deep learning, enterprise AI, and GPU cloud. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Fluidstack also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 101.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put Nebius on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Machine Learning” and especially Machine Learning, Gpu, data center, GPU, HPC, and kubernetes. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Nebius also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 677.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fluidstack and Nebius, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
