ToolMage
Sign in
Grammarly
Communication · 54M monthly visits

Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistant that helps you communicate more effectively. It goes beyond basic grammar and spelling checks to offer suggestions on style, tone, and clarity. Trusted by millions, Grammarly integrates seamlessly into your workflow across various platforms, providing real-time feedback to enhance your emails, documents, and social media posts. Its generative AI features can also help you brainstorm, compose, and rewrite text instantly.

Visit websiteView details
VS
LingoEdit
Language Learning · 3.3K monthly visits

LingoEdit is an AI-powered writing assistant designed to elevate your text. It offers advanced grammar, style, and tone suggestions, along with powerful paraphrasing and multi-language proofreading capabilities to help you write with clarity, confidence, and precision.

Visit websiteView details

Grammarly vs LingoEdit: pricing, features, traffic, and use cases

Compare Grammarly and LingoEdit across positioning, pricing, traffic, and user feedback using structured factual data.

Updated Aug 5, 2026

Product overview

Grammarly Product overview

Grammarly is an AI-powered writing assistant that helps you communicate more effectively. It goes beyond basic grammar and spelling checks to offer suggestions on style, tone, and clarity. Trusted by millions, Grammarly integrates seamlessly into your workflow across various platforms, providing real-time feedback to enhance your emails, documents, and social media posts. Its generative AI features can also help you brainstorm, compose, and rewrite text instantly.

Preview

LingoEdit Product overview

LingoEdit is an AI-powered writing assistant designed to elevate your text. It offers advanced grammar, style, and tone suggestions, along with powerful paraphrasing and multi-language proofreading capabilities to help you write with clarity, confidence, and precision.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeatureGrammarlyLingoEdit
Primary categoryCommunicationLanguage Learning
Added2025-08-062025-08-13
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Official websitewww.grammarly.comblog.lingoedit.com
Product typeWebsiteWebsite
Performance data
User ratingNot verifiedNot verified
Comments00
Monthly visits54M3.3K
Monthly growth-7.5%Not verified
Favorites97106
DetailsView detailsView details

Grammarly vs LingoEdit monthly traffic

Compare Grammarly and LingoEdit by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the Grammarly vs LingoEdit monthly traffic comparison, Grammarly currently shows 54M visits and LingoEdit shows 3.3K; Grammarly has about 16,501.6 times the visible traffic of LingoEdit, an absolute difference of about 54M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Grammarly has complete third-party traffic details; LingoEdit uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

Grammarly monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monthly visits
54M
Avg. visit duration
4:38
Pages per visit
7.82
Bounce rate
42.6%
Data updated 2026-06-15

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 59.6M Monthly visits
  • 2026/1: 55.9M Monthly visits
  • 2026/2: 55.7M Monthly visits
  • 2026/3: 63.6M Monthly visits
  • 2026/4: 58.3M Monthly visits
  • 2026/5: 54M Monthly visits

Top regions

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States67.85%36.6M
🇮🇳India10.22%5.5M
🇬🇧United Kingdom8.79%4.7M
🇵🇭Philippines7.12%3.8M
🇦🇺Australia6.02%3.2M

Traffic sources

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direct84.74%45.7M
Referral10.26%5.5M
Email5%2.7M

Search keywords

ai checkerai detectordetector de iadịchgrammarly

LingoEdit monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Monthly visits
3.3K
Traffic-based selection guidance: The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of Grammarly and LingoEdit

Grammarly Core features

Language Learning
Content Creation
Writing
Communication

LingoEdit Core features

Language Learning
Content Creation
Writing

Use cases

Grammarly Use cases

ai writer
grammar checker
proofreading
style editor
writing assistant
browser extension
communication
generative AI
plagiarism checker
productivity

LingoEdit Use cases

ai writer
grammar checker
proofreading
style editor
writing assistant
content improvement
paraphrasing tool
text editor

Grammarly vs LingoEdit：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth Grammarly vs LingoEdit comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Grammarly is primarily listed under “Communication”, while LingoEdit is primarily listed under “Language Learning”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Grammarly: Communication; LingoEdit: Language Learning); Monthly visits (Grammarly: 54M; LingoEdit: 3.3K); Favorites (Grammarly: 97; LingoEdit: 106); Website (Grammarly: www.grammarly.com; LingoEdit: blog.lingoedit.com); Added (Grammarly: 2025-08-06; LingoEdit: 2025-08-13). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the Grammarly vs LingoEdit monthly traffic comparison, Grammarly currently shows 54M visits and LingoEdit shows 3.3K; Grammarly has about 16,501.6 times the visible traffic of LingoEdit, an absolute difference of about 54M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Only Grammarly has complete third-party traffic details; LingoEdit uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.

The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

Grammarly and LingoEdit currently overlap in shared categories: Language Learning, Content Creation, and Writing; shared tags: ai writer, grammar checker, proofreading, style editor, and writing assistant. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

Grammarly's unique categories/tags are Communication, browser extension, communication, generative AI, plagiarism checker, and productivity; LingoEdit's are content improvement, paraphrasing tool, and text editor. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

Grammarly has no verified rating, 0 comments, 97 favorites, and 99 likes；LingoEdit has no verified rating, 0 comments, 106 favorites, and 112 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate Grammarly first

Put Grammarly on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Communication” and especially Communication, browser extension, communication, generative AI, plagiarism checker, and productivity. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Grammarly also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 54M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate LingoEdit first

Put LingoEdit on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Language Learning” and especially content improvement, paraphrasing tool, and text editor. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

LingoEdit also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 3.3K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Grammarly and LingoEdit, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

Comparison FAQ

How should I choose between Grammarly and LingoEdit?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.