Fellow.app is a secure AI meeting assistant designed to enhance productivity for the entire meeting lifecycle. It automatically records, transcribes, summarizes, and assigns action items, allowing teams to focus on collaboration. With a strong emphasis on privacy, Fellow ensures your meeting data is always protected.
Shadow is an AI meeting assistant for Mac that automatically transcribes, summarizes, and transforms discussions into actionable results. It operates in the background, ensuring every meeting becomes a permanent, searchable knowledge asset, with a strong focus on privacy through on-device local processing.
Fellow.app is a secure AI meeting assistant designed to enhance productivity for the entire meeting lifecycle. It automatically records, transcribes, summarizes, and assigns action items, allowing teams to focus on collaboration. With a strong emphasis on privacy, Fellow ensures your meeting data is always protected.
Shadow is an AI meeting assistant for Mac that automatically transcribes, summarizes, and transforms discussions into actionable results. It operates in the background, ensuring every meeting becomes a permanent, searchable knowledge asset, with a strong focus on privacy through on-device local processing.
| Feature | Fellow.app | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Team Collaboration | Task Management |
| Added | 2025-08-09 | 2025-08-12 |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Official website | fellow.app | www.shadow.do |
| Product type | Website | App |
| Performance data | ||
| User rating | Not verified | Not verified |
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Monthly visits | 194.1K | 23.2K |
| Monthly growth | -2.3% | 54.5% |
| Favorites | 112 | 102 |
| Details | View details | View details |
Compare Fellow.app and Shadow by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic comparison, Fellow.app currently shows 194.1K visits and Shadow shows 23.2K; Fellow.app has about 8.4 times the visible traffic of Shadow, an absolute difference of about 170.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 79.82% | 154.9K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 10.38% | 20.1K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 3.84% | 7.5K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 3.42% | 6.6K |
| 🇲🇽Mexico | 2.54% | 4.9K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 71.92% | 139.6K |
| Referral | 15.12% | 29.3K |
| 12.96% | 25.2K |
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 57.74% | 13.4K |
| 🇮🇳India | 13.8% | 3.2K |
| 🇳🇱Netherlands | 13.23% | 3.1K |
| 🇦🇺Australia | 7.65% | 1.8K |
| 🇩🇪Germany | 7.58% | 1.8K |
This in-depth Fellow.app vs Shadow comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fellow.app is primarily listed under “Team Collaboration”, while Shadow is primarily listed under “Task Management”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Fellow.app: Team Collaboration; Shadow: Task Management); Product type (Fellow.app: Website; Shadow: App); Monthly visits (Fellow.app: 194.1K; Shadow: 23.2K); Monthly growth (Fellow.app: -2.3%; Shadow: 54.5%); Favorites (Fellow.app: 112; Shadow: 102). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the Fellow.app vs Shadow monthly traffic comparison, Fellow.app currently shows 194.1K visits and Shadow shows 23.2K; Fellow.app has about 8.4 times the visible traffic of Shadow, an absolute difference of about 170.9K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Fellow.app first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Fellow.app and Shadow currently overlap in shared categories: Meeting Assistant and Transcription; shared tags: action items, meeting assistant, productivity, and transcription. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Fellow.app's unique categories/tags are Team Collaboration, Note Taking, AI summary, CRM automation, meeting management, note-taking, one-on-one, and secure AI; Shadow's are Task Management, AI notes, local processing, mac app, meeting summary, privacy, and task management. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
Fellow.app has no verified rating, 0 comments, 112 favorites, and 120 likes；Shadow has no verified rating, 0 comments, 102 favorites, and 107 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put Fellow.app on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Team Collaboration” and especially Team Collaboration, Note Taking, AI summary, CRM automation, meeting management, and note-taking. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Fellow.app also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 194.1K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put Shadow on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Task Management” and especially Task Management, AI notes, local processing, mac app, meeting summary, and privacy. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Shadow also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 23.2K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fellow.app and Shadow, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
