Fluidstack is a leading AI cloud platform providing high-performance, dedicated GPU clusters for training and serving frontier AI models. It offers rapid deployment of thousands of GPUs, fully managed services with 24/7 expert support, and transparent pricing with zero egress fees, empowering AI teams to scale without infrastructure friction.
Vast.ai is a leading GPU cloud platform offering on-demand access to a vast network of GPUs for AI and machine learning workloads. It provides developers and enterprises with high-performance computing at significantly lower costs—up to 80% less than traditional cloud providers—through a transparent, pay-as-you-go marketplace.
Product overview
Fluidstack Product overview
Fluidstack is a leading AI cloud platform providing high-performance, dedicated GPU clusters for training and serving frontier AI models. It offers rapid deployment of thousands of GPUs, fully managed services with 24/7 expert support, and transparent pricing with zero egress fees, empowering AI teams to scale without infrastructure friction.
Vast.ai Product overview
Vast.ai is a leading GPU cloud platform offering on-demand access to a vast network of GPUs for AI and machine learning workloads. It provides developers and enterprises with high-performance computing at significantly lower costs—up to 80% less than traditional cloud providers—through a transparent, pay-as-you-go marketplace.
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | Fluidstack | Vast.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Enterprise Solutions | Gpu Rental |
| Added | 2025-08-09 | 2025-08-14 |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Official website | www.fluidstack.io | vast.ai |
| Product type | Website | Website |
| Performance data | ||
| User rating | Not verified | Not verified |
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Monthly visits | 101.4K | 1.4M |
| Monthly growth | 0.4% | 17.1% |
| Favorites | 95 | 109 |
| Details | View details | View details |
Fluidstack vs Vast.ai monthly traffic
Compare Fluidstack and Vast.ai by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the Fluidstack vs Vast.ai monthly traffic comparison, Fluidstack currently shows 101.4K visits and Vast.ai shows 1.4M; Vast.ai has about 13.4 times the visible traffic of Fluidstack, an absolute difference of about 1.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
Fluidstack monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 28.9K Monthly visits
- 2026/1: 91.6K Monthly visits
- 2026/2: 69.4K Monthly visits
- 2026/3: 95.5K Monthly visits
- 2026/4: 101K Monthly visits
- 2026/5: 101.4K Monthly visits
Top regions
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 87.31% | 88.5K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 6.99% | 7.1K |
| 🇮🇳India | 2.34% | 2.4K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 1.75% | 1.8K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 1.61% | 1.6K |
Traffic sources
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 77.86% | 79K |
| Referral | 16.42% | 16.7K |
| 5.72% | 5.8K |
Search keywords
Vast.ai monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 870.3K Monthly visits
- 2026/1: 943.6K Monthly visits
- 2026/2: 1.1M Monthly visits
- 2026/3: 1.2M Monthly visits
- 2026/4: 1.2M Monthly visits
- 2026/5: 1.4M Monthly visits
Top regions
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 38.98% | 530.3K |
| 🇨🇦Canada | 17.55% | 238.7K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 16.16% | 219.8K |
| 🇮🇳India | 14.03% | 190.9K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 13.28% | 180.7K |
Traffic sources
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 96.48% | 1.3M |
| Referral | 2.61% | 35.5K |
| 0.91% | 12.4K |
Search keywords
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of Fluidstack and Vast.ai
Fluidstack Core features
Vast.ai Core features
Use cases
Fluidstack Use cases
Vast.ai Use cases
Fluidstack vs Vast.ai:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth Fluidstack vs Vast.ai comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Fluidstack is primarily listed under “Enterprise Solutions”, while Vast.ai is primarily listed under “Gpu Rental”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Fluidstack: Enterprise Solutions; Vast.ai: Gpu Rental); Monthly visits (Fluidstack: 101.4K; Vast.ai: 1.4M); Monthly growth (Fluidstack: 0.4%; Vast.ai: 17.1%); Favorites (Fluidstack: 95; Vast.ai: 109); Website (Fluidstack: www.fluidstack.io; Vast.ai: vast.ai). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the Fluidstack vs Vast.ai monthly traffic comparison, Fluidstack currently shows 101.4K visits and Vast.ai shows 1.4M; Vast.ai has about 13.4 times the visible traffic of Fluidstack, an absolute difference of about 1.3M visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Vast.ai first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
Fluidstack and Vast.ai currently overlap in shared categories: Cloud Computing; shared tags: AI infrastructure, cloud computing, deep learning, inference, machine learning, and model training. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Fluidstack's unique categories/tags are Enterprise Solutions, Machine Learning, B200, enterprise AI, GPU cloud, H100, and high performance computing; Vast.ai's are Gpu Rental, Api, API, cost-effective GPU, developer tools, GPU rental, and scalable computing. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
Fluidstack has no verified rating, 0 comments, 95 favorites, and 92 likes;Vast.ai has no verified rating, 0 comments, 109 favorites, and 106 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate Fluidstack first
Put Fluidstack on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Enterprise Solutions” and especially Enterprise Solutions, Machine Learning, B200, enterprise AI, GPU cloud, and H100. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Fluidstack also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 101.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Vast.ai first
Put Vast.ai on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Gpu Rental” and especially Gpu Rental, Api, API, cost-effective GPU, developer tools, and GPU rental. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Vast.ai also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 1.4M verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Fluidstack and Vast.ai, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.




