ToolMage
Connexion
groupthink
Transcription · 2.4K visites mensuelles

Groupthink est un assistant de réunion IA qui automatise la prise de notes, la transcription et les résumés sur toutes les principales plateformes. Il offre un choix unique entre un bot visible pour la collaboration d'équipe et un enregistreur de bureau privé pour une capture discrète. Les fonctionnalités incluent des ordres du jour intelligents, le suivi des actions et un chat IA pour interroger les réunions passées, permettant aux professionnels d'économiser jusqu'à 30 % de leur temps de réunion.

Visiter le siteVoir les détails
VS
Supernormal
Réunions · 102.5K visites mensuelles

Supernormal est un assistant de réunion IA qui enregistre, transcrit et résume automatiquement vos réunions sur Google Meet, Zoom et Microsoft Teams. Il vous aide à vous concentrer sur la conversation en s'occupant de la prise de notes, en identifiant les actions à entreprendre et en fournissant des informations exploitables.

Visiter le siteVoir les détails

groupthink vs Supernormal : prix, fonctions et trafic

Comparez groupthink et Supernormal selon leur positionnement, prix, fonctions, trafic et avis.

Mis à jour 5 août 2026

Aperçu du produit

groupthink Aperçu du produit

Groupthink est un assistant de réunion IA qui automatise la prise de notes, la transcription et les résumés sur toutes les principales plateformes. Il offre un choix unique entre un bot visible pour la collaboration d'équipe et un enregistreur de bureau privé pour une capture discrète. Les fonctionnalités incluent des ordres du jour intelligents, le suivi des actions et un chat IA pour interroger les réunions passées, permettant aux professionnels d'économiser jusqu'à 30 % de leur temps de réunion.

Preview

Supernormal Aperçu du produit

Supernormal est un assistant de réunion IA qui enregistre, transcrit et résume automatiquement vos réunions sur Google Meet, Zoom et Microsoft Teams. Il vous aide à vous concentrer sur la conversation en s'occupant de la prise de notes, en identifiant les actions à entreprendre et en fournissant des informations exploitables.

Preview

Detailed feature comparison

FeaturegroupthinkSupernormal
Catégorie principaleTranscriptionRéunions
Ajouté2025-08-052025-08-14
TarificationFreemiumFreemium
Site officielgroupthink.comwww.supernormal.com
Type de produitApplicationSite web
Performance data
Note utilisateurNon vérifiéNon vérifié
Commentaires00
Visites mensuelles2.4K102.5K
Croissance mensuelle-11.3%-40.6%
Favoris96126
DetailsVoir les détailsVoir les détails

groupthink vs Supernormal monthly traffic

Compare groupthink and Supernormal by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.

How to interpret the traffic data

In the groupthink vs Supernormal monthly traffic comparison, groupthink currently shows 2.4K visits and Supernormal shows 102.5K; Supernormal has about 41.9 times the visible traffic of groupthink, an absolute difference of about 100K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

groupthink monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
2.4K
Durée moyenne
0:39
Pages par visite
1.84
Taux de rebond
44.19%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 13K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/1: 10.2K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/2: 3.2K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/3: 3.6K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/4: 2.8K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/5: 2.4K Visites mensuelles

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States100%2.4K

Mots-clés

ai and groupthinkgroupthinggroup thinkgroupthinkgroupthink intelligence

Supernormal monthly traffic:

Latest traffic

Visites mensuelles
102.5K
Durée moyenne
0:28
Pages par visite
2.02
Taux de rebond
43.77%
Data updated 2026-06-11

Monthly traffic trend

  • 2025/9: 242.6K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/1: 165.9K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/2: 142.3K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/3: 142.6K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/4: 172.5K Visites mensuelles
  • 2026/5: 102.5K Visites mensuelles

Principales régions

Top 5 countries/regions
Country/regionPercentageTraffic
🇺🇸United States44.64%45.7K
🇧🇷Brazil33.89%34.7K
🇳🇬Nigeria7.26%7.4K
🇦🇷Argentina7.15%7.3K
🇬🇭Ghana7.06%7.2K

Sources de trafic

Source typePercentageTraffic
Direct87.41%89.6K
Référence9.92%10.2K
E-mail2.67%2.7K

Mots-clés

supernomralsupernormalsupernormal aisupernormal appsupernormal desktop app
Traffic-based selection guidance: If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Supernormal first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Usage comparison

Compare the core capabilities of groupthink and Supernormal

groupthink Core features

Gestion des tâches
Transcription
Assistant de Réunion

Supernormal Core features

Gestion des tâches
Réunions
Transcription
Automatisation

Use cases

groupthink Use cases

Éléments d'action
Collaboration
Google Meet
Résumé de réunion
Microsoft Teams
productivité
Transcription
Zoom
agenda
Assistant IA
Notes de réunion

Supernormal Use cases

Éléments d'action
Collaboration
Google Meet
Résumé de réunion
Microsoft Teams
productivité
Transcription
Zoom
Preneur de notes IA
automatisation
assistant de réunion

groupthink vs Supernormal：In-depth comparison and selection guidance

First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need

This in-depth groupthink vs Supernormal comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. groupthink is primarily listed under “Transcription”, while Supernormal is primarily listed under “Réunions”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.

The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (groupthink: Transcription; Supernormal: Réunions); Product type (groupthink: App; Supernormal: Website); Monthly visits (groupthink: 2.4K; Supernormal: 102.5K); Monthly growth (groupthink: -11.3%; Supernormal: -40.6%); Favorites (groupthink: 96; Supernormal: 126). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.

What market visibility and monthly traffic mean

In the groupthink vs Supernormal monthly traffic comparison, groupthink currently shows 2.4K visits and Supernormal shows 102.5K; Supernormal has about 41.9 times the visible traffic of groupthink, an absolute difference of about 100K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.

Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.

If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Supernormal first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.

Product positioning, use cases, and roles

groupthink and Supernormal currently overlap in shared categories: Gestion des tâches; shared tags: Éléments d'action, Collaboration, Google Meet, Résumé de réunion, Microsoft Teams, productivité, Transcription et Zoom. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.

groupthink's unique categories/tags are Transcription, Assistant de Réunion, agenda, Assistant IA et Notes de réunion; Supernormal's are Réunions, Transcription, Automatisation, Preneur de notes IA, automatisation et assistant de réunion. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.

What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you

groupthink has no verified rating, 0 comments, 96 favorites, and 111 likes；Supernormal has no verified rating, 0 comments, 126 favorites, and 122 likes。

Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.

Selection guidance by actual need

When to evaluate groupthink first

Put groupthink on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Transcription” and especially Transcription, Assistant de Réunion, agenda, Assistant IA et Notes de réunion. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

groupthink also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is app, 2.4K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

When to evaluate Supernormal first

Put Supernormal on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Réunions” and especially Réunions, Transcription, Automatisation, Preneur de notes IA, automatisation et assistant de réunion. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.

Supernormal also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 102.5K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.

How to validate the recommendation before deciding

The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in groupthink and Supernormal, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.

FAQ comparative

How should I choose between groupthink and Supernormal?
Compare positioning, pricing, taxonomy, and traffic maturity, then verify the latest details on each official website.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The factual baseline is derived from product, taxonomy, traffic, and community data. Reviewed editorial conclusions show their source and verification date.
What do unknown fields mean?
Unknown means there is not enough reliable evidence; the page does not fill gaps with assumptions.