Code Genie is an AI-powered, one-click auditing tool for Ethereum-based smart contracts. It leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect vulnerabilities, optimize gas usage, and provide real-time code fixes, making smart contract security fast, affordable, and accessible to all developers.
SolidityScan is an AI-powered smart contract vulnerability scanner and auditing tool. It automates the security analysis of Solidity code, detecting vulnerabilities, suggesting gas optimizations, and ensuring compliance with best practices to secure Web3 applications.
Code Genie is an AI-powered, one-click auditing tool for Ethereum-based smart contracts. It leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect vulnerabilities, optimize gas usage, and provide real-time code fixes, making smart contract security fast, affordable, and accessible to all developers.
SolidityScan is an AI-powered smart contract vulnerability scanner and auditing tool. It automates the security analysis of Solidity code, detecting vulnerabilities, suggesting gas optimizations, and ensuring compliance with best practices to secure Web3 applications.
| Feature | Code Genie | SolidityScan |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Code Auditing | Code Security |
| Added | 2025-08-09 | 2025-08-14 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Official website | www.code-genie.ai | solidityscan.com |
| Product type | Website | Website |
| Performance data | ||
| User rating | Not verified | Not verified |
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Monthly visits | 3.4K | 37.6K |
| Monthly growth | Not verified | 6.7% |
| Favorites | 120 | 102 |
| Details | View details | View details |
Compare Code Genie and SolidityScan by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
In the Code Genie vs SolidityScan monthly traffic comparison, Code Genie currently shows 3.4K visits and SolidityScan shows 37.6K; SolidityScan has about 11 times the visible traffic of Code Genie, an absolute difference of about 34.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only SolidityScan has complete third-party traffic details; Code Genie uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 34.23% | 12.9K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 23.14% | 8.7K |
| 🇮🇩Indonesia | 17.07% | 6.4K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 15.03% | 5.7K |
| 🇮🇳India | 10.53% | 4K |
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 64.13% | 24.1K |
| Referral | 35.87% | 13.5K |
This in-depth Code Genie vs SolidityScan comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. Code Genie is primarily listed under “Code Auditing”, while SolidityScan is primarily listed under “Code Security”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (Code Genie: Code Auditing; SolidityScan: Code Security); Pricing (Code Genie: Paid; SolidityScan: Freemium); Monthly visits (Code Genie: 3.4K; SolidityScan: 37.6K); Favorites (Code Genie: 120; SolidityScan: 102); Website (Code Genie: www.code-genie.ai; SolidityScan: solidityscan.com). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
In the Code Genie vs SolidityScan monthly traffic comparison, Code Genie currently shows 3.4K visits and SolidityScan shows 37.6K; SolidityScan has about 11 times the visible traffic of Code Genie, an absolute difference of about 34.2K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Only SolidityScan has complete third-party traffic details; Code Genie uses visits recorded inside ToolMage. These scopes cannot estimate market share directly, and on-site views should not be treated as the product’s total website traffic.
The current traffic scope is not sufficient for a reliable product ranking. Treat monthly visits as a market-interest signal, then decide using taxonomy, use cases, pricing, and a like-for-like trial rather than reading exposure as product capability.
Code Genie and SolidityScan currently overlap in shared tags: audit, blockchain, developer tools, ethereum, security, smart contract, solidity, vulnerability scanner, and web3. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
Code Genie's unique categories/tags are Code Auditing, Vulnerability Scanner, Smart Contracts, and gas optimization; SolidityScan's are Code Security, Automation, Blockchain, code analysis, defi, and SAST. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
Code Genie has no verified rating, 0 comments, 120 favorites, and 125 likes；SolidityScan has no verified rating, 0 comments, 102 favorites, and 111 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Put Code Genie on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Code Auditing” and especially Code Auditing, Vulnerability Scanner, Smart Contracts, and gas optimization. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Code Genie also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 3.4K on-site monthly views, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
Put SolidityScan on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Code Security” and especially Code Security, Automation, Blockchain, code analysis, defi, and SAST. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
SolidityScan also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 37.6K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in Code Genie and SolidityScan, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
