Devzery is an AI-powered platform that automates API functional regression testing. Its self-driving AI agent streamlines end-to-end testing, integrates with CI/CD pipelines, and provides codeless automation. It's designed to accelerate software release cycles, reduce development costs, and enhance test management efficiency by identifying bugs early and ensuring flawless API performance.
Qodex is an AI-powered platform that simplifies and accelerates API testing and security. It automatically discovers your APIs, generates comprehensive tests from plain English prompts, and integrates seamlessly into your developer workflow. Reduce test creation time by 80% and ship bug-free software faster.
Product overview
devzery Product overview
Devzery is an AI-powered platform that automates API functional regression testing. Its self-driving AI agent streamlines end-to-end testing, integrates with CI/CD pipelines, and provides codeless automation. It's designed to accelerate software release cycles, reduce development costs, and enhance test management efficiency by identifying bugs early and ensuring flawless API performance.
Qodex Product overview
Qodex is an AI-powered platform that simplifies and accelerates API testing and security. It automatically discovers your APIs, generates comprehensive tests from plain English prompts, and integrates seamlessly into your developer workflow. Reduce test creation time by 80% and ship bug-free software faster.
Detailed feature comparison
| Feature | devzery | Qodex |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Code Assistant | Security |
| Added | 2025-08-09 | 2025-08-10 |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Official website | www.devzery.com | qodex.ai |
| Product type | Website | Website |
| Performance data | ||
| User rating | Not verified | Not verified |
| Comments | 0 | 0 |
| Monthly visits | 40.9K | 104.3K |
| Monthly growth | -24.8% | -14.3% |
| Favorites | 101 | 127 |
| Details | View details | View details |
devzery vs Qodex monthly traffic
Compare devzery and Qodex by monthly reach, traffic trend, visit depth, top regions, and acquisition sources.
How to interpret the traffic data
In the devzery vs Qodex monthly traffic comparison, devzery currently shows 40.9K visits and Qodex shows 104.3K; Qodex has about 2.6 times the visible traffic of devzery, an absolute difference of about 63.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
devzery monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 99.4K Monthly visits
- 2026/1: 79K Monthly visits
- 2026/2: 65.4K Monthly visits
- 2026/3: 61.3K Monthly visits
- 2026/4: 54.4K Monthly visits
- 2026/5: 40.9K Monthly visits
Top regions
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸United States | 34.75% | 14.2K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 18.43% | 7.5K |
| 🇷🇺Russia | 16.61% | 6.8K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 15.49% | 6.3K |
| 🇻🇳Vietnam | 14.72% | 6K |
Traffic sources
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 80.22% | 32.8K |
| Referral | 19.78% | 8.1K |
Search keywords
Qodex monthly traffic:
Latest traffic
Monthly traffic trend
- 2025/9: 95.5K Monthly visits
- 2026/1: 118.5K Monthly visits
- 2026/2: 97.8K Monthly visits
- 2026/3: 115K Monthly visits
- 2026/4: 121.7K Monthly visits
- 2026/5: 104.3K Monthly visits
Top regions
Top 5 countries/regions
| Country/region | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳India | 38.23% | 39.9K |
| 🇺🇸United States | 28.15% | 29.4K |
| 🇬🇧United Kingdom | 12.95% | 13.5K |
| 🇳🇬Nigeria | 11.72% | 12.2K |
| 🇧🇷Brazil | 8.95% | 9.3K |
Traffic sources
| Source type | Percentage | Traffic |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | 74.54% | 77.8K |
| Referral | 16.11% | 16.8K |
| 9.35% | 9.8K |
Search keywords
Usage comparison
Compare the core capabilities of devzery and Qodex
devzery Core features
Qodex Core features
Use cases
devzery Use cases
Qodex Use cases
devzery vs Qodex:In-depth comparison and selection guidance
First decide whether the products solve the same kind of need
This in-depth devzery vs Qodex comparison uses only the product records, taxonomy, audience, traffic, and community signals available on this page. devzery is primarily listed under “Code Assistant”, while Qodex is primarily listed under “Security”, so the first decision is whether your actual task matches their recorded scope.
The structured fields currently show these decision-relevant differences: Primary category (devzery: Code Assistant; Qodex: Security); Pricing (devzery: Paid; Qodex: Freemium); Monthly visits (devzery: 40.9K; Qodex: 104.3K); Monthly growth (devzery: -24.8%; Qodex: -14.3%); Favorites (devzery: 101; Qodex: 127). These facts are more useful for selection than brand visibility alone.
What market visibility and monthly traffic mean
In the devzery vs Qodex monthly traffic comparison, devzery currently shows 40.9K visits and Qodex shows 104.3K; Qodex has about 2.6 times the visible traffic of devzery, an absolute difference of about 63.4K visits. This reflects visible reach, not feature quality or paid users.
Both tools provide verified traffic details, so monthly trends, visit depth, regions, and acquisition sources can be compared on the same basis.
If public market visibility is an important first-pass criterion, investigate Qodex first. The final choice should still follow taxonomy, use case, and a real trial because higher traffic does not prove broader capabilities or better workflow fit.
Product positioning, use cases, and roles
devzery and Qodex currently overlap in shared categories: Testing and Automation; shared tags: API testing, CI/CD, developer tools, quality assurance, and software development. This can place both on the same shortlist, but it does not prove equal implementation, depth, or cost.
devzery's unique categories/tags are Code Assistant, AI agent, automation, bug tracking, codeless, and regression testing; Qodex's are Security, automated testing, DevSecOps, GitHub integration, no-code, and security testing. These unique fields are the strongest differentiators: validate the product whose recorded scope matches the task instead of following traffic alone.
What ratings, comments, and favorites can tell you
devzery has no verified rating, 0 comments, 101 favorites, and 107 likes;Qodex has no verified rating, 0 comments, 127 favorites, and 131 likes。
Neither product has enough rating or comment samples for a credible reputation ranking.
Selection guidance by actual need
When to evaluate devzery first
Put devzery on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Code Assistant” and especially Code Assistant, AI agent, automation, bug tracking, codeless, and regression testing. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
devzery also currently records: pricing is paid, product type is website, 40.9K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
When to evaluate Qodex first
Put Qodex on the priority trial list when the task aligns with “Security” and especially Security, automated testing, DevSecOps, GitHub integration, no-code, and security testing. This follows recorded positioning and does not imply unlisted capabilities are absent.
Qodex also currently records: pricing is freemium, product type is website, 104.3K verified monthly visits, no verified user rating. Verify any hard requirement around price, platform, or reach before trial, and do not let sparse review data substitute for testing.
How to validate the recommendation before deciding
The available data describes positioning, public visibility, and community signals, but it cannot prove output quality, speed, integration effort, privacy, or long-term cost in your workflow. Before deciding, run the same representative tasks in devzery and Qodex, then record completion time, accuracy, manual corrections, and the real paid threshold. A like-for-like trial turns this comparison into a defensible adoption decision.
Comparison FAQ
How should I choose between devzery and Qodex?
Where does this comparison data come from?
What do unknown fields mean?
Related AI tools

Autoflow
Autoflow is an AI-powered, no-code automated testing tool designed for modern QA teams, developers, and product managers. It enables 10x faster cross-browser testing for complex web application flows without writing a single line of code. It streamlines test creation, execution, and maintenance, fostering collaboration and accelerating release cycles.
Testing
Playrun
Playrun is an AI-powered, no-code platform that automatically generates tests for your web application's user flows. It proactively catches bugs and regressions by running tests periodically, alerting you before your users are affected. This helps improve software quality and user retention without manual test scripting.
Testing
Kusho
Kusho is an AI-powered platform that automates software testing for developers and enterprises. It uses autonomous AI agents to transform inputs into comprehensive, ready-to-run test suites for both web UIs and backend APIs. By automatically generating and maintaining tests, Kusho helps teams achieve over 90% test coverage, accelerate deployment cycles, and ship bug-free code with confidence.
Code Assistant
Jyek
Jyek is an AI agent platform that understands objectives, creates execution plans, uses tools, and delivers verifiable results for complex, multi-step tasks.
Automation
Reflect
Reflect is an AI-powered, no-code automated web testing platform. It uses generative AI to convert plain English instructions into robust tests, eliminating the need for fragile selectors. Reflect accelerates testing by 10x, automatically adapting to UI changes and reducing maintenance. It supports web, mobile, API, and visual testing, integrating seamlessly with existing CI/CD and project management workflows to enhance test coverage and development speed.
Automation
Meticulous
Meticulous is an AI-powered tool that revolutionizes front-end testing. It automatically generates and maintains visual end-to-end tests by recording user interactions, eliminating the need for manual test scripting. This helps development teams catch regressions, cover edge cases, and ship code faster with confidence, without the hassle of flaky or high-maintenance tests.
Code Quality
bottest.ai
bottest.ai is a no-code automated testing platform for AI chatbots. It enables developers to ensure chatbot quality, performance, and security through regression testing, AI-powered test coverage, and adversarial testing. Record, evaluate, and improve your chatbot conversations effortlessly at a fraction of the cost of manual QA.
Chatbot
testfox
testfox is an AI-powered platform designed to automate and accelerate the software testing lifecycle. It intelligently generates test cases, executes them, identifies bugs, and provides detailed analytics, enabling development teams to ship higher-quality software faster.
Quality Assurance
AI Web Test Aitida
AI Web Test Aitida is an AI-powered platform for automated website testing. It simplifies quality assurance by allowing users to create, run, and manage complex test suites using natural language. The tool specializes in visual regression and end-to-end user flow testing, helping teams catch bugs faster and ensure a flawless user experience across all browsers and devices.
Quality Assurance
Spur
Spur is an AI QA engineer that automates software testing without any coding. Simply describe your test cases in plain English, and Spur's intelligent agent will execute them, identifying bugs that manual testing often misses. It's designed for fast-moving teams in e-commerce, travel, and B2C to ship products faster and with greater confidence. Spur's reliable, self-healing tests eliminate flakiness and reduce maintenance, allowing developers and QA teams to focus on building better products.
Testing
TestZeus
TestZeus is an AI-powered, no-code test automation platform specifically designed for Salesforce. It utilizes autonomous AI agents to write, execute, and maintain tests from natural language inputs, achieving up to 100% test coverage in days while eliminating maintenance overhead.
Testing
QASolve
QASolve is an AI-augmented software testing and automation platform offered as a service. It autonomously generates over 80% of test automation scripts within a week, using AI agents to explore applications and create self-healing tests. This service accelerates QA cycles, reduces costs, and integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines without requiring any coding from developers.
Testing
Sennu AI
Sennu AI is a Y Combinator-backed platform that revolutionizes Salesforce QA with AI-powered agents. It offers a no-code, zero-maintenance solution that automatically generates and executes functional tests directly from your user stories. By connecting to your sprint board, Sennu AI creates comprehensive test plans, runs them in your sandbox, and saves engineering teams over 10 hours per sprint, ensuring 99% reliable and consistent test execution.
Crm
Lila
Lila is an AI-powered testing framework that simplifies end-to-end (e2e) testing for web applications. Using natural language, anyone can create robust, self-healing tests that integrate seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines. It's built on Playwright and designed to be resilient to UI changes, making test automation accessible and low-maintenance for startups, QA teams, and large enterprises.
TestingTestSprite
TestSprite is an AI-powered test automation platform designed to streamline UI and visual regression testing. It helps development and QA teams accelerate their testing cycles, improve accuracy, and reduce maintenance overhead with intelligent, self-healing tests and a codeless interface.
Testing



